Intervention Review

Frameless versus classical intrauterine device for contraception

  1. Paul O'Brien1,*,
  2. Caroline C Marfleet2

Editorial Group: Cochrane Fertility Regulation Group

Published Online: 24 JAN 2005

Assessed as up-to-date: 12 NOV 2004

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003282.pub2


How to Cite

O'Brien P, Marfleet CC. Frameless versus classical intrauterine device for contraception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD003282. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003282.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Westminster Primary Care Trust, Raymede Clinic, Westside Contraceptive Services, London, UK

  2. 2

    Colchester, Essex, UK

*Paul O'Brien, Raymede Clinic, Westside Contraceptive Services, Westminster Primary Care Trust, Exmoor St, London, W10 6DZ, UK. paulobrien@nhs.net.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 24 JAN 2005

SEARCH

Options for accessing this content:

  • If you are a society or association member and require assistance with obtaining online access instructions please contact our Journal Customer Services team.
    http://wiley.force.com/Interface/ContactJournalCustomerServices_V2.
  • Login via other institutional login options http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/login-options.
  • You can purchase online access to this Article for a 24-hour period (price varies by title)
    • If you already have a Wiley Online Library or Wiley InterScience user account: login above and proceed to purchase the article.
    • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.

Login via OpenAthens

or

Search for your institution's name below to login via Shibboleth.

Please register to:

  • Save publications, articles and searches
  • Get email alerts
  • Get all the benefits mentioned below!

Register now >

Patient Access

Patients and/or caregivers may access this content for use in relation to their own personal healthcare or that of a family member only. Terms and conditions will apply.