Intervention Review

Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception

  1. Huib AAM Van Vliet2,
  2. David A Grimes1,*,
  3. Frans M Helmerhorst3,
  4. Kenneth F Schulz4,
  5. Laureen M Lopez1

Editorial Group: Cochrane Fertility Regulation Group

Published Online: 19 JUL 2006

Assessed as up-to-date: 3 MAY 2011

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003283.pub2


How to Cite

Van Vliet HAAM, Grimes DA, Helmerhorst FM, Schulz KF, Lopez LM. Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD003283. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003283.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    FHI, Clinical Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

  2. 2

    Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Gynaecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine, Leiden, Netherlands

  3. 3

    Leiden University Medical Center, Gynaecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine and Dept. of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden, Netherlands

  4. 4

    FHI, Quantitative Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

*David A Grimes, Clinical Sciences, FHI, PO Box 13950, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, NC 27709, USA. dgrimes@fhi.org.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New search for studies and content updated (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 19 JUL 2006

SEARCH

  1. Current Version

    Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception

    Huib AAM Van Vliet, David A Grimes, Frans M Helmerhorst, Kenneth F Schulz and Laureen M Lopez

    Article first published online: 19 JUL 2006 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003283.pub2

Previous versions of this article and their online publication dates

  1. Version 1

    Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception

    HAAM Van Vliet, DA Grimes, FM Helmerhorst and KF Schulz

    Article first published online: 23 APR 2001 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003283