Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Tobacco cessation interventions for young people

  1. Alan Stanton1,
  2. Gill Grimshaw2,*

Editorial Group: Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group

Published Online: 23 AUG 2013

Assessed as up-to-date: 31 JUL 2013

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003289.pub5


How to Cite

Stanton A, Grimshaw G. Tobacco cessation interventions for young people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 8. Art. No.: CD003289. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003289.pub5.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Heart of England Foundation Trust, Shirley, UK

  2. 2

    Warwick Medical School, Medical Teaching Centre, Coventry, UK

*Gill Grimshaw, Medical Teaching Centre, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. gill@gillgrimshaw.com.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New search for studies and content updated (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 23 AUG 2013

SEARCH

[Figure 1]
Figure 1. Study flow diagram
[Figure 2]
Figure 2. Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3. Analysis 3.1 Motivational enhancement versus brief interventions, cessation at 6 months or longer.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4. Forest plot of comparison: 5 NoT (Not on Tobacco), outcome: 5.1 Cessation at 6 months or longer.
[Analysis 1.1]
Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Effect sizes for all studies with extractable data, Outcome 1 Subgroups by abstinence definition.
[Analysis 1.2]
Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Effect sizes for all studies with extractable data, Outcome 2 New studies in 2013.
[Analysis 2.1]
Analysis 2.1. Comparison 2 TTM vs standard care or dietary advice, Outcome 1 Cessation at 1 year.
[Analysis 2.2]
Analysis 2.2. Comparison 2 TTM vs standard care or dietary advice, Outcome 2 Cessation at 2 years.
[Analysis 3.1]
Analysis 3.1. Comparison 3 Motivational enhancement vs brief interventions, Outcome 1 Cessation at 6 months or longer.
[Analysis 3.2]
Analysis 3.2. Comparison 3 Motivational enhancement vs brief interventions, Outcome 2 Complex interventions including Motivational Interviewing.
[Analysis 4.1]
Analysis 4.1. Comparison 4 Interventions including Cognitive Behavioural Techniques, Outcome 1 Cessation at 6 months or longer.
[Analysis 5.1]
Analysis 5.1. Comparison 5 Complex interventions using M I, Social cognitive theory, CBT or/and TTM, Outcome 1 Biochemically verified 6 month continuous abstinence.
[Analysis 5.2]
Analysis 5.2. Comparison 5 Complex interventions using M I, Social cognitive theory, CBT or/and TTM, Outcome 2 6 month continuous cessation.
[Analysis 5.3]
Analysis 5.3. Comparison 5 Complex interventions using M I, Social cognitive theory, CBT or/and TTM, Outcome 3 Cessation at 6 months, ≧ 7days PPA.
[Analysis 6.1]
Analysis 6.1. Comparison 6 NoT (Not on Tobacco), Outcome 1 Cessation at 6 months or longer.
[Analysis 6.2]
Analysis 6.2. Comparison 6 NoT (Not on Tobacco), Outcome 2 NoT+Fit vs Control.
[Analysis 6.3]
Analysis 6.3. Comparison 6 NoT (Not on Tobacco), Outcome 3 NoT+Fit vs NOT.
[Analysis 7.1]
Analysis 7.1. Comparison 7 ICT-based interventions, Outcome 1 30 day PPA at 6 months.
[Analysis 7.2]
Analysis 7.2. Comparison 7 ICT-based interventions, Outcome 2 7 day PPA at 12 months.
[Analysis 7.3]
Analysis 7.3. Comparison 7 ICT-based interventions, Outcome 3 30 day abstinence at 12m.
[Analysis 8.1]
Analysis 8.1. Comparison 8 Pharmacological interventions, Outcome 1 Point prevalence abstinence at six months.
[Analysis 9.1]
Analysis 9.1. Comparison 9 Russell Standards, Outcome 1 Biochemically verified 6 month continuous abstinence.