Intervention Review

Nonlatex versus latex male condoms for contraception

  1. Maria F Gallo1,
  2. David A Grimes2,
  3. Laureen M Lopez3,*,
  4. Kenneth F Schulz4

Editorial Group: Cochrane Fertility Regulation Group

Published Online: 25 JAN 2006

Assessed as up-to-date: 18 DEC 2012

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003550.pub2


How to Cite

Gallo MF, Grimes DA, Lopez LM, Schulz KF. Nonlatex versus latex male condoms for contraception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD003550. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003550.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    The Ohio State University, Division of Epidemiology, Columbus, Ohio, USA

  2. 2

    University of North Carolina, Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

  3. 3

    FHI 360, Clinical and Epidemiological Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, USA

  4. 4

    FHI 360 and UNC School of Medicine, Quantitative Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, USA

*Laureen M Lopez, Clinical and Epidemiological Sciences, FHI 360, 359 Blackwell St, Suite 200, Durham, North Carolina, 27701, USA. llopez@fhi360.org.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Stable (no update expected for reasons given in 'What's new')
  2. Published Online: 25 JAN 2006

SEARCH

  1. Current Version

    Nonlatex versus latex male condoms for contraception

    Maria F Gallo, David A Grimes, Laureen M Lopez and Kenneth F Schulz

    Article first published online: 25 JAN 2006 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003550.pub2

Previous versions of this article and their online publication dates

  1. Version 1

    Non-latex versus latex male condoms for contraception

    MF Gallo, DA Grimes and KF Schulz

    Article first published online: 22 APR 2003 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003550