Intervention Review

Beta2-agonists for exercise-induced asthma

  1. Matteo Bonini1,2,3,*,
  2. Corrado Di Mambro4,
  3. Moises A Calderon3,
  4. Enrico Compalati5,
  5. Holger Schünemann6,
  6. Stephen Durham3,
  7. Giorgio W Canonica5

Editorial Group: Cochrane Airways Group

Published Online: 2 OCT 2013

Assessed as up-to-date: 13 SEP 2013

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003564.pub3

How to Cite

Bonini M, Di Mambro C, Calderon MA, Compalati E, Schünemann H, Durham S, Canonica GW. Beta2-agonists for exercise-induced asthma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD003564. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003564.pub3.

Author Information

  1. 1

    "Sapienza" University, Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Rome, Italy

  2. 2

    Institute of Translational Pharmacology (IFT), CNR, Rome, Italy

  3. 3

    National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospital, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, London, UK

  4. 4

    Children's Hospital "Bambino Gesù", Department of Medical and Surgical Pediatric Cardiology - UOC Arrhythmology, Rome, Italy

  5. 5

    University of Genoa, Allergy and Respiratory Diseases Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), Genoa, Italy

  6. 6

    McMaster University, Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

*Matteo Bonini, matte.bonini@gmail.com.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New
  2. Published Online: 2 OCT 2013

SEARCH

 

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Plain language summary

Background

It is well known that physical exercise can trigger asthma symptoms and can induce bronchial obstruction in people without clinical asthma. International guidelines on asthma management recommend the use of beta2-agonists at any stage of the disease. At present, however, no consensus has been reached about the efficacy and safety of beta2-agonists in the pretreatment of exercise-induced asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. For the purpose of the present review, both of these conditions are referred to by the acronymous EIA, independently from the presence of an underlying chronic clinical disease.

Objectives

To assess the effects of inhaled short- and long-acting beta2-agonists, compared with placebo, in the pretreatment of children and adults with exercise-induced asthma (or exercise-induced bronchoconstriction).

Search methods

Trials were identified by electronic searching of the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of Trials and by handsearching of respiratory journals and meetings. Searches are current as of August 2013.

Selection criteria

We included randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of any study design, published in full text, that assessed the effects of inhaled beta2-agonists on EIA in adults and children. We excluded studies that did not clearly state diagnostic criteria for EIA.

Data collection and analysis

We used standard methodological procedures as expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.

Main results

We included 53 trials consisting of 1139 participants. Forty-eight studies used a cross-over design, and five were performed in accordance with a parallel-group design. Forty-five studies addressed the effect of a single beta2-agonist administration, and eight focused on long-term treatment. We addressed these two different intervention regimens as different comparisons.

Among primary outcomes for short-term administration, data on maximum fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) showed a significant protective effect for both short-acting beta-agonists (SABA) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) compared with placebo, with a mean difference of -17.67% (95% confidence interval (CI) -19.51% to -15.84%, P = 0.00001, 799 participants from 72 studies). The subgroup analysis of studies performed in adults compared with those performed in children showed high heterogeneity confined to children, despite the comparable mean bronchoprotective effect.

Secondary outcomes on other pulmonary function parameters confirmed a more positive and protective effect of beta2-agonists on EIA compared with placebo. Occurrence of side effects was not significantly different between beta2-agonists and placebo.

Overall evaluation of the included long-term studies suggests a beta2-agonist bronchoprotective effect for the first dose of treatment. However, long-term use of both SABA and LABA induced the onset of tolerance and decreased the duration of drug effect, even after a short treatment period.

Authors' conclusions

Evidence of low to moderate quality shows that beta2-agonists, both SABA and LABA, when administered in a single dose, are effective and safe in preventing EIA.

Long-term regular administration of inhaled beta2-agonists induces tolerance and lacks sufficient safety data. This finding appears to be of particular clinical relevance in view of the potential for prolonged regular use of beta2-agonists as monotherapy in the pretreatment of EIA, despite the warnings of drug agencies (FDA, EMA) regarding LABA.

 

Plain language summary

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Plain language summary

Asthma reliever inhalers (beta2-agonists) used for exercise-induced asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Review question

Physical exercise may trigger symptoms such as cough, chest tightness and shortness of breath in people with asthma that is not adequately treated (exercise-induced asthma). Sometimes people who do not have asthma still experience asthma-like symptoms during exercise; this is called exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. We looked at both types of people in this review. The treatments we were interested in are called beta2-agonists. These are drugs that are known to open up the airways (small tubes in the lungs), making it easier for people to breathe. Two kinds of beta2-agonists are available: short-acting (SABA, e.g. salbutamol and terbutaline) and long-acting (LABA, e.g. formoterol and salmeterol).

What evidence did we find?

We found 53 trials consisting of 1139 participants. Forty-eight studies used a cross-over design, which meant that each person in the trial received two or more treatments-one or more active treatments, the beta-agonist and a placebo in random order. The rest were parallel-group trials, meaning that people received either the active treatment or a placebo. Most of the studies addressed the effect of a giving a single beta2-agonist treatment before exercise and recorded the effect on lung function following exercise. Only eight focused on longer treatment-longer treatments would be needed to assess whether these treatments were harmful over the longer term.

Results

Studies in which people received a single administration of a beta-agonist showed that FEV1 (a measure of lung function) fell significantly less for people taking SABA or LABA compared with placebo (mean difference (MD) -17.67%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -19.51% to -15.84%). Other lung function measures confirmed that beta2-agonists were more beneficial compared with placebo. No significant difference in the number of side effects was noted in people taking SABA or LABA compared with people taking placebo. However, it is unlikely that people would be prescribed an inhaler for a single treatment, so we must consider longer-term studies to get a true measure of the side effects that inhalers can cause.

We found that included longer-term studies showed that beta2-agonists were helpful in terms of lung function for the first dose of treatment. However, studies that provided longer-term treatment with SABA or LABA showed that over time, people built up a tolerance to the effects of treatments, and the beneficial effects lasted for shorter periods of time.

Quality of the evidence

Overall, we believe that the evidence was of low to moderate quality.

Conclusions

This review shows that beta2-agonists-both SABA and LABA-when administered in a single dose, are effective and safe in preventing the symptoms of EIA. Longer-term administration of inhaled beta2-agonists induces tolerance and lacks sufficient safety data. It is important to note that taking LABA without background inhaled steroids is considered unsafe and is not currently recommended in most of the clinical guidelines for asthma. We recommend that more studies are needed to determine whether it is safe to administer inhaled beta2-agonists alone to people who experience asthma symptoms when exercising.

This review is current as of August 2013.