Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Oral treatments for fungal infections of the skin of the foot.

  1. Sally EM Bell-Syer1,*,
  2. Rachel Hart2,
  3. Fay Crawford3,
  4. David J Torgerson4,
  5. Wendy Tyrrell2,
  6. Ian Russell5

Editorial Group: Cochrane Skin Group

Published Online: 21 JAN 2009

Assessed as up-to-date: 4 DEC 2001

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003584

How to Cite

Bell-Syer SEM, Hart R, Crawford F, Torgerson DJ, Tyrrell W, Russell I. Oral treatments for fungal infections of the skin of the foot.. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD003584. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003584.

Author Information

  1. 1

    University of York, Department of Health Sciences, York, North Yorkshire, UK

  2. 2

    University of Wales Institute, Faculty of Community Health Sciences, Cardiff, Wales, UK

  3. 3

    The University of Edinburgh, Division of Community Health Sciences, Edinburgh, UK

  4. 4

    University of York, Department of Health Sciences , York, North Yorkshire, UK

  5. 5

    University of Wales Bangor, Institute of Medical and Social Care Research, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales, UK

*Sally EM Bell-Syer, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Area 2 Seebohm Rowntree Building, Heslington, York, North Yorkshire, YO10 5DD, UK. sembs1@york.ac.uk.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 21 JAN 2009

SEARCH

 
Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]
DeKeyser 1994

MethodsRCT
Aim clear: yes
blinding: NS
double blind study: yes
comparability, age: yes, sex: yes, duration: NS
inc & ex crit: yes
interv describe: yes
compliance: yes
ITT: NS
sample calc: NS
fungi identified: yes
species btwn gps: yes
adv events: yes
recurrence status: yes
drop outs: yes


Participantsoriginal sample: 366
total evaluable sample: 117 a: 51; b: 66
exclusion criteria: no systemic antifungals taken three months before study, no topical antifungals taken two weeks before study


Interventionsa: terbinafine 250 mg one active tablet and one placebo capsule taken orally daily for 2 weeks.
b: itraconazole 100 mg one active capsule and one placebo tablet taken orally daily for 2 weeks.


Outcomesprimary outcome: cure, demonstrated by negative results on microscopy and no growth of dermatophyte in culture
secondary outcome: clinical signs and symptoms: exudation, erythema, scaling, vesiculation, pustules, crusting, pruritus
adverse events: a: 23 b: 10


Notestinea pedis
only 11 withdrawals accounted for.


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Allocation concealment?UnclearB - Unclear





Difonzo 1995

MethodsRCT
Aim clear: yes
blinding: NS
double blind study: yes
comparability, age: yes, sex: yes, duration: yes
inc & ex crit: yes
interv describ: yes
compliance: NS
ITT: NS
sample calc: NS
fungi identified: yes
species btwn gps: yes
adv events: yes
recurrence status: NS
drop outs: yes


Participantstreatment setting: multicentre
original sample: 37
total evaluable sample: 35 a: 17; b: 18
exclusion criteria: no systemic antifungals taken one month before study


Interventionsa: itraconazole 100mg one capsule taken daily for 30 days
b: fluconazole 50 mg one capsule taken orally daily for 30 days.


Outcomesprimary outcome: cure, demonstrated by negative results on microscopy and no growth of dermatophyte in culture
secondary outcome: clinical signs and symptoms: exudation, erythema, vesicles, desquamation, maceration, fissuring.
adverse events: a: 1, b:5


Notes


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Allocation concealment?UnclearB - Unclear





Fischbein 1992

MethodsRCT
Aim clear: yes
blinding: NS
double blind study: yes
comparability, age: yes, sex: yes, duration: yes
inc & ex crit: yes
interv describ: yes
compliance: NS
ITT: NS
sample calc: NS
fungi identified: yes
species btwn gps: data combined for multiple sites
recurrence status: NS
drop outs: no


Participantstreatment setting: multicentre
original sample: 189
total evaluable sample: 53 a: 27; b: 26
exclusion criteria: no systemic or topical antifungals taken three days before study


Interventionsa: fluconazole 50 mg once daily for an average period of 4 weeks
b: ketoconazole 200mg once daily for an average of 4 weeks


Outcomesprimary outcome: cure, demonstrated by negative results on microscopy and no growth of dermatophyte in culture
secondary outcome: clinical signs and symptoms: exudation, erythema, vesicles, desquamation, maceration, fissuring.
adverse events: reported for multiple sites on the body


Notesfungal skin infection across multiple sites - tinea pedis data separated out


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Allocation concealment?UnclearB - Unclear





Hay 1995

MethodsRCT
Aim clear: yes
blinding: NS
double blind study: yes
comparability, age: yes sex: yes duration: yes
inc & ex crit: yes
interv describ: yes
compliance: no
ITT: yes
sample calc: yes:
fungi identified: yes
species btwn gps: yes
adv events: yes
recurrence status: NS
drop outs: yes


Participantsoriginal sample: 190
total evaluable sample: 129 a: 65; b: 64
exclusion criteria:no systemic antifungals taken six weeks before study, no topical antifungals taken seven days before study, no terbinafine or itraconazole taken for three months before study.


Interventionsa: terbinafine 250 mg one active tablet and one placebo capsule taken orally for 14 days, then one placebo tablet and one placebo capsule taken orally daily for 14 days.
b: itraconazole 100 mg one active capsule and one placebo tablet taken orally daily for 28 days.


Outcomesprimary outcome: cure, demonstrated by negative results on microscopy and no growth of dermatophyte in culture
secondary outcome:(i) clinical signs and symptoms: erythema, scaling, vesiculation, pruritus.
(ii) tolerability
adverse events: a: 52, b: 46


Notesplantar type tinea pedis


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Allocation concealment?UnclearB - Unclear





Kim 1993

MethodsRCT
Aim clear: NS
blinding: NS
double blind study: yes
comparability, age: yes, sex: yes duration: NS
inc & ex crit: NS
interv describ: yes
compliance: NS
ITT: NS
sample calc: NS
fungi identified: yes
species btwn gps: no
adv events: yes
recurrence status: no
drop outs: yes


Participantsoriginal sample: 66
total evaluable sample: 44; a 22; b 22
exclusion criteria: concomitant antifungal therapy not allowed


Interventionsa: terbinafine 250 mg taken orally once daily for 2 weeks followed by placebo taken orally once daily for 2 weeks.
b: itraconazole 100 mg tablet taken orally once daily for 4 weeks.


Outcomesprimary outcome: cure, demonstrated by negative results on microscopy and no growth of dermatophyte in culture
secondary outcome: clinical signs and symptoms: exudation, erythema, scaling, vesiculation, pustules, crusting, pruritus.
adverse events: a: 2, b: 3


Notesmoccasin type tinea pedis


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Allocation concealment?UnclearB - Unclear





Nozickova 1998

MethodsRCT
Aim clear: yes
blinding: NS
double blind study: yes
comparability, age: yes, sex: yes, duration: NS
inc & ex crit: NS
interv describ: yes
compliance: NS
ITT: yes
sample calc: NS
fungi identified: yes
species btwn gps: yes
adv events: yes
recurrence status: stated as undertaken but not reported
drop outs: no


Participantstreatment setting: hospital
initial sample: 114
total evaluable sample:63; a: 34; b: 29
exclusion criteria: not stated


Interventionsa: fluconazole 150mg once weekly for a max. of 6 weeks
b: fluconazole 50mg once daily for a max. of 6 weeks
The intervention ceased when a cured condition was achieved


Outcomesprimary outcome: cure, demonstrated by negative results on microscopy and no growth of dermatophyte in culture
secondary outcome: clinical efficiency based on a cured condition and an assessment of clinical signs and symptoms.
adverse events: (no of events) a: 2; b: 3 across all intervention groups


Notestinea pedis, tinea cruris, tinea corporis


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Allocation concealment?YesA - Adequate





Roberts 1987

MethodsRCT
Aim clear: NS
blinding: NS
double blind study: yes
comparability, age: NS sex: NS, duration: yes
inc & ex crit: NS
interv describ: yes
compliance: NS
ITT: NS
sample calc: NS
fungi identified: yes
species btwn gps: yes
adv events: no
recurrence status: no
drop outs: no


Participantstreatment setting: hospital
initial sample 29
total evaluable sample: 29; a:15; b: 14.
exclusion criteria: not stated


Interventionsa: ketoconazole 200 mg once daily for 4 weeks
b: griseofulvin 1000mg once daily for 4 weeks
In both groups participants were offered further treatment of up to four weeks in duration if primary outcome of cure had not been achieved


OutcomesPrimary outcome: cure, demonstrated by negative results on microscopy and no growth of dermatophyte in culture
secondary outcome: clinical signs and symptoms: peeling, maceration, fissuring, weeping, bleeding, itching, burning.
adverse events - not reported


Notestinea pedis


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Allocation concealment?UnclearB - Unclear





Savin 1990a

MethodsRCT
Aim clear: yes
blinding:NS
double blind study: yes
comparability, age: yes, sex: yes, duration: yes
inc & ex crit: yes
interv describ: yes
compliance: NS
ITT: NS
sample calc: NS
fungi identified: yes
species btwn gps: yes
adv events: yes
recurrence status: NS
drop outs: yes


Participantstreatment setting: two treatment centres
Initial sample: 50
total evaluable sample: 41; a: 23; b: 18.
exclusion criteria: any radiotherapy, treatment with cytostatic or immunosuppressant drugs, antibiotics, antifungals, antivirals or antiparasitics within two weeks prior to study


Interventionsa. terbinafine 125mg taken twice daily for 6 weeks
b. placebo taken twice daily for 6 weeks


Outcomesprimary outcome: cure, demonstrated by negative results on microscopy and no growth of dermatophyte in culture
secondary outcome: clinical signs and symptoms: erythema, scaling, vesiculation, pustules, pruritus.
adverse events: number of patients (no. of events) a: 3(3) ; b: 3(3).


Notesmoccasin type tinea pedis


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Allocation concealment?UnclearB - Unclear





Savin 1990b

MethodsRCT
Aim clear: yes
blinding:NS
double blind study: yes
comparability, age: yes, sex: yes, duration: yes
inc & ex crit: yes
interv describ: yes
compliance: NS
ITT: NS
sample calc: NS
fungi identified: yes
species btwn gps: yes
adv events: yes
recurrence status: NS
drop outs: yes


ParticipantsInitial sample: 36
total evaluable sample: 28; a: 16; b: 12.
exclusion criteria: no topical agents taken two weeks , and no systemic agents four weeks before the study starts


Interventionsa. terbinafine 125mg taken twice daily for 6 weeks
b. griseofulvin 250mg (microsize) taken twice daily for 6 weeks


Outcomesprimary outcome: cure, demonstrated by negative results on microscopy and no growth of dermatophyte in culture
secondary outcome: clinical signs and symptoms: erythema, pustules, pruritus, desquamation, hyperkeratosis
adverse events: number of patients (no. of events) a:(2); b: (4)


Notesmoccasin type tinea pedis


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Allocation concealment?UnclearB - Unclear





Svejgaard 1998

MethodsRCT
Aim clear: yes
blinding: NS
double blind study: yes
comparability, age: yes, sex: yes, duration: NS
inc & ex crit: yes
interv describ: yes
compliance: NS
ITT: yes
sample calc: NS
fungi identified: yes
species btwn gps: yes
adv events: yes
recurrence status: stated on entry to trial
drop outs: yes


Participantstreatment setting: multicentre
initial sample: 72
total evaluable sample: 69; a: 34; b: 35.
exclusion criteria: no systemic agent six months before study starts


Interventionsa. itraconazole 200mg taken twice daily for 1 week
b. placebo taken twice daily for one week


Outcomesprimary outcome: cure, demonstrated by negative results on microscopy and no growth of dermatophyte in culture
secondary outcome: clinical signs and symptoms: exudation, eythema, scaling, vesicular, pustules, crusting, pruritus, itching, burning.
Clinical global evaluation was reported
adverse events (no of events) a: (7) b: (5)


Notesmoccasin type tinea pedis


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Allocation concealment?YesA - Adequate





Voravutinon 1993

MethodsRCT
Aim clear: yes
blinding: NS
double blind study: yes
comparability, age: yes, sex: yes, duration: yes
inc & ex crit: NS
interv describ: yes
compliance: NS
ITT: NS
sample calc: NS
fungi identified: yes
species btwn gps: yes
adv events: yes
recurrence status: NS
drop outs: yes


Participantstreatment setting: hospital dermatology outpatients
Initial sample:50
total evaluable sample: 49; a: 23; b; 26.
exclusion criteria: not stated


Interventionsa. terbinafine 250mg taken once daily for 2 weeks
b. itraconazole 100mg taken once daily for 4 weeks


Outcomesprimary outcome: cure, demonstrated by negative results on microscopy and no growth of dermatophyte in culture
secondary outcome: clinical signs and symptoms: exudation, erythema, scaling, vesiculation, crusting, pruritus.
adverse events: number of patients (no. of events) a: (2); b: (3)


Notestinea pedis


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Allocation concealment?UnclearB - Unclear





Widyanto 1993

MethodsRCT
Aim clear: yes
blinding: NS
double blind study: yes
comparability, age: yes, sex: yes, duration: NS
inc & ex crit: yes
interv describ: yes
compliance: NS
ITT: NS
sample calc: NS
fungi identified: yes
species btwn gps: yes
adv events: yes
recurrence status: NS
drop outs: yes


ParticipantsInitial sample: 55
total evaluable sample: 43; a:21; b: 22.
exclusion criteria: no antifungals taken two weeks prior to start of study


Interventionsa. griseofulvin 500mg per day for 4 weeks
b. terbinafine 250mg per day for 4 weeks


Outcomesprimary outcome: cure, demonstrated by negative results on microscopy and no growth of dermatophyte in culture
secondary outcome: clinical signs and symptoms: erythema, vesiculation, pustules, crusting, pruritus, maceration, squama.
adverse events: none


Notestinea pedis


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Allocation concealment?UnclearB - Unclear

 aim clear - study aim clearly described
blinding = blinded assessor of primary outcome
comparability - participants comparable at baseline for age, sex and duration of complaint
inc & ex crit - inclusion and exclusion criteria specified
interv describ - interventions well described
compliance - assessment of compliance
ITT - intention to treat analysis
sample calc - a priori sample size calculation undertaken
species btwn gps - distribution of species between groups
adv events - adverse events reported
drop outs -- number of drop outs stated


 
Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]

StudyReason for exclusion

Barnetson 1998combined data for topical and oral treatments

Degreef 1987combined data for foot and hand infections

Del Palacio 1993combined data for foot and hand infections

Hay 1991combined data for foot and hand infections

Jolly 1983combined data

Legendre 1980not enough data reported, unclear length of treatment time

Lynfield 1974combined data for topical and oral treatments

Russell 1960no microscopy and culture as an outcome

Savin 1989duplicate reporting of trial

Savin/b 1990duplicate reporting of trial

Schuller 1998combined data for foot and hand infections

Tausch 1998combined data for foot and hand infections

Van Hecke 1988combined data for foot and hand infections

Wishart 1994combined data for foot and hand infections

Won 1993no microscopy and culture as an outcome



 
Comparison 1. ANTIFUNGAL vs PLACEBO

Outcome or subgroup titleNo. of studiesNo. of participantsStatistical methodEffect size

 1 Cured (itraconazole, 400 mg/day vs placebo)1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

    1.1 week 4
1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Not estimable

    1.2 week 8
1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Not estimable

    1.3 week 9
1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Not estimable

 2 Cured (terbinafine, 250 mg/day vs placebo)1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

    2.1 week 6
1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Not estimable

    2.2 week 8
1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Not estimable

 
Comparison 2. DIFFERENT TYPES OF ANTIFUNGALS

Outcome or subgroup titleNo. of studiesNo. of participantsStatistical methodEffect size

 1 Cured (terbinafine, 250 mg/day vs itraconazole, 100 mg/day)4Risk Difference (M-H, Random, 95% CI)Subtotals only

    1.1 week 2
4339Risk Difference (M-H, Random, 95% CI)0.01 [-0.05, 0.07]

    1.2 week 4
3222Risk Difference (M-H, Random, 95% CI)0.08 [-0.05, 0.20]

    1.3 week 8
3295Risk Difference (M-H, Random, 95% CI)0.12 [-0.08, 0.33]

    1.4 week 12 plus
1129Risk Difference (M-H, Random, 95% CI)0.10 [-0.05, 0.25]

    1.5 common treatment length (4 weeks)
3222Risk Difference (M-H, Random, 95% CI)0.05 [-0.06, 0.17]

 2 Cured (itraconazole, 100 mg/day vs fluconazole, 50 mg/day)1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

    2.1 week 4
1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Not estimable

    2.2 week 10
1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Not estimable

 3 Cured (fluconazole, 50 mg/day vs ketoconazole, 200 mg/day)1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

    3.1 week 4
1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Not estimable

    3.2 week 7
1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Not estimable

 4 Cured (ketaconazole, 200 mg/day vs griseofulvin, 1000 mg/day)1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

    4.1 week 2
1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Not estimable

    4.2 week 4
1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Not estimable

    4.3 week 8
1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Not estimable

 5 Cured ( terbinafine, 250 mg vs griseofulvin, 500 mg)2Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Subtotals only

    5.1 week 4
143Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)0.53 [0.28, 0.78]

    5.2 week 6
128Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)0.69 [0.42, 0.96]

    5.3 week 8
128Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)0.5 [0.22, 0.78]

    5.4 last outcome point
271Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)0.52 [0.33, 0.71]

 6 Cured (fluconazole, 150 mg/wk vs fluconazole, 50 mg/day)1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Totals not selected

    6.1 week 6
1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Not estimable

    6.2 week 10
1Risk Difference (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)Not estimable

 
Comparison 3. PRESENTATION OF TINEA PEDIS

Outcome or subgroup titleNo. of studiesNo. of participantsStatistical methodEffect size

 1 Plantar tinea pedis2173Risk Difference (M-H, Random, 95% CI)0.06 [-0.07, 0.20]

 2 Mixed distribution of tinea pedis2166Risk Difference (M-H, Random, 95% CI)0.18 [-0.11, 0.47]

 
Comparison 4. ADVERSE EVENTS AND LOSS TO FOLLOW-UP

Outcome or subgroup titleNo. of studiesNo. of participantsStatistical methodEffect size

 1 Summary of adverse events reported for trials of tinea pedisOther dataNo numeric data

 
Analysis 4.1 Comparison 4 ADVERSE EVENTS AND LOSS TO FOLLOW-UP, Outcome 1 Summary of adverse events reported for trials of tinea pedis.
Summary of adverse events reported for trials of tinea pedis

Studytotal no of ad eventn (eval / enrolled)

DeKeyser 1994terbinafine 23

itraconazole 10
117 / 366

Difonzo 1995itraconazole 1

fluconazole 5
35 / 37

Fischbein 1992reported for multiple sites53 / 189

Hay 1995terbinafine 52

itraconazole 46
129 / 190

Kim 1993terbinafine 2

itraconazole 3
44 / 66

Nozickova 1998150 mg fluconazole 2

50 mg fluconazole 3
63 / 114

Roberts 1987not reported29 / 29

Savin 1990aterbinafine 3

placebo 3
41 / 50

Savin 1990bterbinafin 2

griseofulvin 4
28 / 36

Svejgaard 1998itraconazole 7

placebo 5
69 / 72

Voravutinon 1993terbinafine 2

itraconazole 3
49 / 50

Widyanto 1993none reported43 / 55