Intervention Review

Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure or continuous positive airway pressure compared to conventional ventilation for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure in children

  1. Prakeshkumar S Shah1,*,
  2. Arne Ohlsson2,
  3. Jyotsna P Shah3

Editorial Group: Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group

Published Online: 4 NOV 2013

Assessed as up-to-date: 2 JUL 2013

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003699.pub4


How to Cite

Shah PS, Ohlsson A, Shah JP. Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure or continuous positive airway pressure compared to conventional ventilation for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 11. Art. No.: CD003699. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003699.pub4.

Author Information

  1. 1

    University of Toronto Mount Sinai Hospital, Department of Paediatrics and Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

  2. 2

    University of Toronto, Departments of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

  3. 3

    Mount Sinai Hospital, Department of Paediatrics, Markham, Ontario, Canada

*Prakeshkumar S Shah, Department of Paediatrics and Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1XB, Canada. pshah@mtsinai.on.ca.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 4 NOV 2013

SEARCH

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Ricardo M Fernandes, Is there randomized controlled trial evidence to support the use of continuous negative extrathoracic pressure or continuous positive airway pressure rather than conventional ventilation in children with bronchiolitis admitted to the ICU?, Cochrane Clinical Answers,