Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials

  1. Anneliese Synnot1,2,*,
  2. Rebecca Ryan1,2,
  3. Megan Prictor2,
  4. Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh3,
  5. Barbara Parker4

Editorial Group: Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group

Published Online: 9 MAY 2014

Assessed as up-to-date: 13 JUN 2012

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003717.pub3


How to Cite

Synnot A, Ryan R, Prictor M, Fetherstonhaugh D, Parker B. Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 5. Art. No.: CD003717. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003717.pub3.

Author Information

  1. 1

    La Trobe University, Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Public Health and Human Biosciences, Bundoora, Vic, Australia

  2. 2

    School of Public Health and Human Biosciences, La Trobe University, Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia

  3. 3

    La Trobe University, Australian Centre for Evidence Based Aged Care (ACEBAC), Bundoora, Victoria, Australia

  4. 4

    La Trobe University, Australian Institute for Primary Care & Ageing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia

*Anneliese Synnot, Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Public Health and Human Biosciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic, 3086, Australia. a.synnot@latrobe.edu.au.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New search for studies and content updated (conclusions changed)
  2. Published Online: 9 MAY 2014

SEARCH

[Figure 1]
Figure 1. Study flow diagram
[Figure 2]
Figure 2. Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3. Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
[Analysis 1.1]
Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Audio-visual informed consent versus standard informed consent, Outcome 1 Knowledge.
[Analysis 1.2]
Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Audio-visual informed consent versus standard informed consent, Outcome 2 Rate of participation.
[Analysis 1.3]
Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 Audio-visual informed consent versus standard informed consent, Outcome 3 Time taken to administer.
[Analysis 2.1]
Analysis 2.1. Comparison 2 Audio-visual plus standard informed consent versus standard informed consent, Outcome 1 Knowledge.
[Analysis 2.2]
Analysis 2.2. Comparison 2 Audio-visual plus standard informed consent versus standard informed consent, Outcome 2 Knowledge.
[Analysis 2.3]
Analysis 2.3. Comparison 2 Audio-visual plus standard informed consent versus standard informed consent, Outcome 3 Rate of participation.
[Analysis 2.4]
Analysis 2.4. Comparison 2 Audio-visual plus standard informed consent versus standard informed consent, Outcome 4 Retention of knowledge.
[Analysis 3.1]
Analysis 3.1. Comparison 3 Audio-visual informed consent versus placebo informed consent, Outcome 1 Knowledge.
[Analysis 3.2]
Analysis 3.2. Comparison 3 Audio-visual informed consent versus placebo informed consent, Outcome 2 Knowledge.
[Analysis 3.3]
Analysis 3.3. Comparison 3 Audio-visual informed consent versus placebo informed consent, Outcome 3 Satisfaction with the information provided.
[Analysis 3.4]
Analysis 3.4. Comparison 3 Audio-visual informed consent versus placebo informed consent, Outcome 4 Rate of participation.
[Analysis 3.5]
Analysis 3.5. Comparison 3 Audio-visual informed consent versus placebo informed consent, Outcome 5 Satisfaction with the media used.