This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (17 MAR 2010)

Intervention Review

Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer

  1. Anna Dorothea ADW Wagner1,*,
  2. Winfried WG Grothe2,
  3. Susanne Behl3,
  4. Gerhard GK Kleber4,
  5. Axel AG Grothey5,
  6. Johannes Haerting6,
  7. Wolfgang E. Fleig7

Editorial Group: Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group

Published Online: 20 APR 2005

Assessed as up-to-date: 19 DEC 2004

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004064.pub2


How to Cite

Wagner ADADW, Grothe WWG, Behl S, Kleber GGK, Grothey AAG, Haerting J, Fleig WE. Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD004064. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004064.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, First Department of Medicine, Halle/Saale, Germany

  2. 2

    Martin-Luther-University , Department of Internal Medicine I, Halle/Saale, Germany

  3. 3

    Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Halle, Germany

  4. 4

    Ostalb-Klinikum Aalen, Internal Medicine I, Aalen, Germany

  5. 5

    Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Rochester, USA

  6. 6

    Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Informatics, Halle (Saale), Sachsen Anhalt, Germany

  7. 7

    Universitätsklinikum Liepzig AöR, Leipzig, Germany

*Anna Dorothea ADW Wagner, First Department of Medicine, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube Str. 40, Halle/Saale, 06097, Germany. anna-dorothea.wagner@gmx.de.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 20 APR 2005

SEARCH

This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (17 MAR 2010)

 

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Plain language summary

Background

Gastric cancer currently ranks second in global cancer mortality. Most patients are either diagnosed at an advanced stage, or develop a relapse after apparently curative operation. Apart from supportive measures, systemic chemotherapy is the only treatment option available in this situation.

Objectives

To assess the effect of chemotherapy versus best supportive care, combination versus single agent chemotherapy and different combination chemotherapy regimens in advanced gastric cancer.

Search strategy

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2004), MEDLINE and EMBASE up to February 2004 and reference lists of articles. We also contacted pharmaceutical companies as well as national and international experts.

Selection criteria

Randomised controlled trials on systemic intravenous chemotherapy versus best supportive care, combination versus single agent chemotherapy and different combination chemotherapies in advanced gastric cancer.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors independently extracted data. A third investigator was consulted in case of disagreements. We contacted study authors to obtain missing information.

Main results

Chemotherapy versus best supportive care consistently demonstrated a significant benefit in terms of overall survival in favour of the group receiving chemotherapy (Hazard Ratios (HR) 0.39; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.28 to 0.52). Combination versus single-agent chemotherapy provides evidence for a survival benefit in favour of combination chemotherapy (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.76 to 0.96). Numbers included in these comparisons were 184 and 1338 participants respectively. This benefit is achieved at the price of increased toxicity in the combination chemotherapy arms. When comparing 5-FU/cisplatin-containing combination therapy regimens with anthracyclines versus those without anthracyclines (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.95 based on 501 participants) and 5-FU/anthracycline-containing combinations with cisplatin versus those without cisplatin (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.76 to 0.91 based on 1147 participants), there was a significant survival benefit for regimens including 5-FU, anthracyclines and cisplatin.

Authors' conclusions

Chemotherapy significantly improves survival in comparison to best supportive care. In addition, combination chemotherapy improves survival compared to single-agent 5-FU, but the effect size is much smaller. Among the combination chemotherapy regimens studied, best survival results are achieved with regimens containing 5-FU, anthracyclines and cisplatin. In this category, ECF (epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous infusion 5-FU) is tolerated best.

 

Plain language summary

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Plain language summary

Combination chemotherapy including 5-FU, anthracyclines and cisplatin gave the best survival results for advanced gastric cancer, and ECF is tolerated best.

Gastric cancer currently ranks second in global cancer mortality. 80 to 90% of all patients are either diagnosed at an advanced stage when the tumour is inoperable, or develop a recurrence within five years. Chemotherapy clearly improves survival in comparison to best supportive care only. In addition, combination chemotherapy further improves survival compared to single-agent 5-FU. Among the combination chemotherapy regimens studied, best survival results are achieved with regimens containing 5-FU, anthracyclines and cisplatin. Among these, ECF (epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous infusion 5-FU) is tolerated best. However, combination chemotherapies have higher rates of adverse effects, and their impact on the patients' quality of life has not been adequately studied.