This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (17 MAR 2010)
Intervention Review
Non-surgical interventions for eosinophilic oesophagitis
Editorial Group: Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group
Published Online: 21 JAN 2009
Assessed as up-to-date: 1 FEB 2006
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004065.pub2
Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Database Title
Additional Information
How to Cite
Kukuruzovic RH, Elliott EJ, O'Loughlin ETEDV, Markowitz JE. Non-surgical interventions for eosinophilic oesophagitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD004065. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004065.pub2.
Publication History
- Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
- Published Online: 21 JAN 2009
This is not the most recent version of the article.View current version (17 Mar 2010)
Abstract
Background
Patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis (EO) present with difficulty swallowing, vomiting, regurgitation, chest and/or abdominal pain. People with EO frequently fail to respond to treatment with gastric acid suppressants or anti-reflux surgery.
Objectives
To evaluate the benefits and harms of medical interventions for eosinophilic oesophagitis.
Search strategy
We searched the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group trials register (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2004), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2004) and EMBASE (1980 to February 2004). These searches were run again in February 2005 and 2006 but no new trials were found.
Selection criteria
Randomised controlled trials were included if they compared a medical or dietary intervention for eosinophilic oesophagitis with a placebo or one medical intervention with another medical intervention.
Data collection and analysis
Two reviewers independently screened the title of abstracts.
Main results
No completed RCTs were found in the published literature. We found one abstract reporting preliminary data from an RCT (not completed) comparing oral prednisolone with topical (swallowed metered dose) fluticasone in children. In this study (50 children enrolled to date) healing rates of oesophagitis and symptom resolution with fluticasone were similar to those with prednisolone. For another ongoing RCT, comparing the efficacy of swallowed fluticasone with placebo for eosinophilic oesophagitis in males and females aged 3 to 21 years no results are available.
Authors' conclusions
The lack of completed RCT's makes it impossible to compare the relative benefits and harms of the wide range of medical interventions currently used for treating EO. Published case series suggest that an elemental diet, oral steroids and topical steroids all offer some benefits. However, lack of a comparison group in these studies makes it impossible to evaluate the effect of these interventions.
Plain language summary
A systematic review of the literature did not identify any randomised controlled trials evaluating the benefits and harms of medical treatments for eosinophilic oesophagitis.
People with eosinophilic oesophagitis (EO) present with difficulty swallowing, vomiting, regurgitation, and chest and/or abdominal pain. Frequently, symptoms do not resolve with acid suppressive treatment or anti-reflux surgery. The cause of EO is unknown; however dietary and/or environmental factors may contribute to disease. In our systematic review we found no completed randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating treatments for eosinophilic oesophagitis. Two RCTs are currently underway. One compares steroid spray with oral prednisolone and the other compares steroid spray with placebo.
