This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (4 APR 2016)

Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

High-frequency ventilation versus conventional ventilation for treatment of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

  1. Sachin Sud1,*,
  2. Maneesh Sud2,
  3. Jan O Friedrich3,
  4. Hannah Wunsch4,
  5. Maureen O Meade5,
  6. Niall D Ferguson6,
  7. Neill KJ Adhikari7

Editorial Group: Cochrane Anaesthesia, Critical and Emergency Care Group

Published Online: 28 FEB 2013

Assessed as up-to-date: 1 MAR 2011

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004085.pub3


How to Cite

Sud S, Sud M, Friedrich JO, Wunsch H, Meade MO, Ferguson ND, Adhikari NKJ. High-frequency ventilation versus conventional ventilation for treatment of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD004085. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004085.pub3.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Trillium Health Center, University of Toronto, Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Mississauga, Canada

  2. 2

    University of Toronto, Department of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

  3. 3

    University of Toronto and Keenan Research Centre/Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Critical Care and Medicine Departments, St. Michael's Hospital, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

  4. 4

    Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, Department of Anesthesiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons; Department of Epidemiology, New York, NY, USA

  5. 5

    McMaster University, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

  6. 6

    University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

  7. 7

    University of Toronto, and Department of Critical Care Medicine and Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

*Sachin Sud, Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Trillium Health Center, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Canada. sachinsud@aol.com.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New search for studies and content updated (conclusions changed)
  2. Published Online: 28 FEB 2013

SEARCH

This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (04 APR 2016)

  1. You have free access to this content

    Current Version

    High-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome

    Sachin Sud, Maneesh Sud, Jan O Friedrich, Hannah Wunsch, Maureen O Meade, Niall D Ferguson and Neill KJ Adhikari

    Version of Record online: 4 APR 2016 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004085.pub4

Previous versions of this article and their online publication dates

  1. You have free access to this content

    Version 3

    High-frequency ventilation versus conventional ventilation for treatment of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome

    Sachin Sud, Maneesh Sud, Jan O Friedrich, Hannah Wunsch, Maureen O Meade, Niall D Ferguson and Neill KJ Adhikari

    Version of Record online: 28 FEB 2013 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004085.pub3