Alcohol ignition interlock programmes for reducing drink driving recidivism

  • Review
  • Intervention


  • Charlene Willis,

    Corresponding author
    1. The University of Queensland, Centre of National Research on Disability and Rehabilitation Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
    • Charlene Willis, Centre of National Research on Disability and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Queensland, Level 3, Mayne Medical School, Herston Road, Brisbane, Queensland, 4006, Australia.

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Sean Lybrand,

    1. Merck, Sharp & Dohme (Australia) Pty Ltd, Health Outcomes, Granville, New South Wales, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Nicholas Bellamy

    1. The University of Queensland, Centre of National Research on Disability and Rehabilitation Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author



An ignition interlock device is part of a multi-dimensional programme aimed at reducing recidivism in convicted drink drivers. To operate a vehicle equipped with an ignition interlock device, the driver must first provide a breath specimen. If the breath alcohol concentration of the specimen exceeds the predetermined level, the vehicle will not start. As a measure to reduce circumvention of the device (i.e. someone else blows into the mouthpiece), random retests are required while the vehicle is running. Other components of the drink driving programme include information seminars for the driver and downloading data from the device's data logger, which logs all test attempts and records all passes, warnings and failures.


To systematically assess the effectiveness of ignition interlock programmes on recidivism rates of drink drivers, by examining rates of recidivism while the ignition interlock device was installed in the vehicle and after removal of the device.

Search methods

We searched The Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised register (Sept 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2002), PubMed (to Aug 2002), EMBASE (1980 to Sept 2002), TRANSPORT (1988 to 2002 issue 06), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2002, Issue 3), The Science Citation Index (1980 to Sept 2002)
National Research Register (2002, issue 3). We also searched the Internet using various search engines.

Selection criteria

Controlled trials in which offenders have been charged with drink driving and have either been sentenced to participate in an ignition interlock programme or the usual punishment (either licence suspension or some form of treatment programme). This study was not restricted by language or status of publication.

Data collection and analysis

One randomised controlled trial (RCT) and ten controlled trials were identified, and also three ongoing trials. Data regarding recidivism while the interlock is installed in the vehicle; after the interlock has been removed from the vehicle and total recidivism during the study were extracted and entered into analyses using RevMan.

Main results

The RCT showed that the interlock programme was effective while the device was installed in the vehicle; relative risk 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.63). Controlled trials support this conclusion, with a general trend − in both first-time and repeat offenders − towards lower recidivism rates when the interlock device is installed. Neither the RCT nor the controlled trials provide evidence for any effectiveness of the programmes continuing once the device has been removed.

Authors' conclusions

In order to eliminate potential selection bias, more RCTs need to be conducted in this area so that effectiveness, as well as efficacy, can be ascertained. The interlock programme appears to be effective while the device is installed in the vehicle of the offender. Studies need to address ways of improving recidivism rates in the long term, as the major challenges are participation rates, compliance and durability.














隨機控制試驗可發現安裝酒駕測試裝置時能有效降低酒駕發生率;相對風險0.36(95﹪信賴區間 0.21∼0.63)。控制試驗也支持這樣的結果,且可看出一項趨勢:無論酒駕初犯或累犯,安裝酒駕測試裝置時酒駕發生率都是較低的。隨機控制試驗及控制試驗皆無證據顯示移除酒駕測試裝置後仍能有效降低酒駕發生率。


為了降低潛在性篩選誤差,需要再引用更多隨機控制試驗,以兼顧效力與效度。酒駕測試裝置計劃顯示車輛安裝酒駕測試裝置能降低酒駕率。未來的研究需要 投注在如何長期降低酒駕率,以及如何促進參與率、順從性及耐久性。



此翻譯計畫由臺灣國家衛生研究院(National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan)統籌。



Plain language summary

Alcohol ignition interlocks may stop repeat drink driving offences, but only as long as they are still fitted

Convicted drink drivers are sometimes offered the choice of a standard punishment, or for an alcohol ignition interlock to be fitted to their car for a fixed period. To operate a vehicle equipped with an interlock, the driver must first give a breath specimen. If the breath alcohol concentration of the specimen is too high, the vehicle will not start. A number of studies have been conducted to see whether the interlock stops drink drivers from offending again. Most of these studies have not been of high quality. The interlock seems to reduce re-offending as long as it is still fitted to the vehicle, but there is no long-term benefit after it has been removed. However, more studies of good quality are needed to confirm these findings. The low percentage of offenders who choose to have an interlock fitted also makes it difficult to reach firm conclusions about their effectiveness.