Intervention Review

Botulinum toxin injections for the treatment of spasmodic dysphonia

  1. Christopher Watts1,*,
  2. Renata Whurr2,
  3. Chad Nye3

Editorial Group: Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group

Published Online: 20 JAN 2010

Assessed as up-to-date: 21 JUL 2009

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004327.pub2

How to Cite

Watts C, Whurr R, Nye C. Botulinum toxin injections for the treatment of spasmodic dysphonia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD004327. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004327.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Texas Christian University, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

  2. 2

    The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Therapies Services, London, UK

  3. 3

    University of Central Florida, UCF CARD Center, Orlando, Florida, USA

*Christopher Watts, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Texas Christian University, TCU Box 297450, Fort Worth, Texas, TX 76129, USA. c.watts@tcu.edu.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New search for studies and content updated (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 20 JAN 2010

SEARCH

 

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Plain language summary

Background

This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in Issue 3, 2004 of The Cochrane Library and previously updated in 2007.

The use of botulinum toxin for the treatment of spasmodic dysphonia is currently the treatment of choice for management of this neurological voice disorder. Over the past 20 years, botulinum toxin has been used to treat both adductor and abductor forms of the disorder, with vocal improvement noted after treatment for both. A large number of studies have attempted to document the efficacy of botulinum toxin for improvement of vocal symptoms in individuals with spasmodic dysphonia.

Objectives

To determine the effectiveness of botulinum toxin for treating spasmodic dysphonia.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group Trials Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of Science; BIOSIS Previews; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; mRCT and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the most recent search was 22 July 2009, following a previous search update in 2007.

Selection criteria

All studies in which the participants were randomly allocated prior to intervention and in which botulinum toxin was compared to either an alternative treatment, placebo or non-treated control group.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors independently evaluated all potential studies meeting the selection criteria noted above for inclusion. One study met the inclusion criteria and was included in the final analysis.

Main results

Only one study in the literature met the inclusion criteria. This was the only study identified which reported a treatment/no treatment comparison. It reported significant beneficial effects for fundamental frequency (Fo), Fo range, spectrographic analysis, independent ratings of voice severity and patient ratings of voice improvement.

Authors' conclusions

The evidence from randomized controlled trials does not allow firm conclusions to be drawn about the effectiveness of botulinum toxin for all types of spasmodic dysphonia, or for patients with different behavioral or clinical characteristics.

 

Plain language summary

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Plain language summary

Botulinum toxin injections for the treatment of spasmodic dysphonia

Botulinum toxin is currently the gold standard of treatment for patients with spasmodic dysphonia. It has been used over the past two decades to treat both adductor and abductor forms of the disorder. The results of this review of randomized controlled trials indicate that botulinum toxin is effective for some aspects of voice production, including perceptual measures of improvement post-injection, variability of fundamental frequency, vocal intensity and subglottal air pressure. These benefits may be dependent on certain subject variables, such as the amount of voice use immediately post-injection and treatment variables such as dosage and location of injection. These results should currently be interpreted with caution, however, as studies have used small sample sizes and have methodological differences which prevent between-study comparisons.