Intervention Review

Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section

  1. Bosede B Afolabi1,*,
  2. Afolabi FE Lesi2,
  3. Nkihu A Merah3

Editorial Group: Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group

Published Online: 20 JAN 2010

Assessed as up-to-date: 14 AUG 2006

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub2

Database Title

Additional Information

How to Cite

Afolabi BB, Lesi AFE, Merah NA. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004350. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    University of Lagos, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lagos, Nigeria

  2. 2

    College of Medicine of the University of Lagos, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Lagos, Nigeria

  3. 3

    University of Lagos, Department of Anaesthesia, Lagos, Nigeria

*Bosede B Afolabi, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Lagos, College of Medicine, PMB 12003, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria. bosedeafolabi2003@yahoo.com.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 20 JAN 2010

SEARCH

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Summary (58K)Standard (308K)Full (514K)

  1. Current Version

    Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section

    Bosede B Afolabi, Afolabi FE Lesi and Nkihu A Merah

    Article first published online: 20 JAN 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub2

Previous versions of this article and their online publication dates

  1. Version 1

    Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section

    BB Afolabi and AFE Lesi

    Article first published online: 19 JUL 2006 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350

View Full Article (HTML) Summary (58K)Standard (308K)Full (514K)