Intervention Review

Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section

  1. Bosede B Afolabi1,*,
  2. Foluso EA Lesi2

Editorial Group: Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group

Published Online: 17 OCT 2012

Assessed as up-to-date: 30 NOV 2011

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3


How to Cite

Afolabi BB, Lesi FEA. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD004350. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3.

Author Information

  1. 1

    University of Lagos, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lagos, Nigeria

  2. 2

    College of Medicine of the University of Lagos, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Lagos, Nigeria

*Bosede B Afolabi, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Lagos, College of Medicine, PMB 12003, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria. bosedeafolabi2003@yahoo.com.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New search for studies and content updated (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 17 OCT 2012

SEARCH

  1. Current Version

    Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section

    Bosede B Afolabi and Foluso EA Lesi

    Article first published online: 17 OCT 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub3

Previous versions of this article and their online publication dates

  1. Version 2

    Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section

    Bosede B Afolabi, Afolabi FE Lesi and Nkihu A Merah

    Article first published online: 18 OCT 2006 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350.pub2

  2. Version 1

    Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section

    BB Afolabi and AFE Lesi

    Article first published online: 21 JUL 2003 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004350