Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee

  1. Marlene Fransen1,*,
  2. Sara McConnell2

Editorial Group: Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group

Published Online: 8 JUL 2009

Assessed as up-to-date: 12 AUG 2008

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004376.pub2

Database Title

Additional Information

How to Cite

Fransen M, McConnell S. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004376. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004376.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

  2. 2

    St Joseph's Health Care Centre, Department of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

*Marlene Fransen, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Room 0212, Cumberland Campus C42, Sydney, New South Wales, 1825, Australia. m.fransen@usyd.edu.au.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 8 JUL 2009

SEARCH

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Summary (57K)Standard (508K)Full (784K)
[Analysis 1.1]
Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 All included studies, Outcome 1 Pain.
[Analysis 1.2]
Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 All included studies, Outcome 2 Physical function.
[Analysis 2.1]
Analysis 2.1. Comparison 2 Treatment content, Outcome 1 Pain.
[Analysis 2.2]
Analysis 2.2. Comparison 2 Treatment content, Outcome 2 Physical Function.
[Analysis 3.1]
Analysis 3.1. Comparison 3 Treatment delivery mode, Outcome 1 Pain.
[Analysis 3.2]
Analysis 3.2. Comparison 3 Treatment delivery mode, Outcome 2 Physical Function.
[Analysis 4.1]
Analysis 4.1. Comparison 4 Number of contact occasions, Outcome 1 Pain.
[Analysis 4.2]
Analysis 4.2. Comparison 4 Number of contact occasions, Outcome 2 Physical Function.
[Analysis 5.1]
Analysis 5.1. Comparison 5 Blinding of outcomes assessment, Outcome 1 Pain.
[Analysis 5.2]
Analysis 5.2. Comparison 5 Blinding of outcomes assessment, Outcome 2 Physical Function.
[Analysis 6.1]
Analysis 6.1. Comparison 6 Statistical analysis method, Outcome 1 Pain.
[Analysis 6.2]
Analysis 6.2. Comparison 6 Statistical analysis method, Outcome 2 Physical Function.
[Analysis 7.1]
Analysis 7.1. Comparison 7 Allocation concealment, Outcome 1 Pain.
[Analysis 7.2]
Analysis 7.2. Comparison 7 Allocation concealment, Outcome 2 Physical Function.
[Analysis 8.1]
Analysis 8.1. Comparison 8 Estimated risk of bias, Outcome 1 Pain.
[Analysis 8.2]
Analysis 8.2. Comparison 8 Estimated risk of bias, Outcome 2 Physical Function.
[Analysis 9.1]
Analysis 9.1. Comparison 9 Sample size, Outcome 1 Pain.
[Analysis 9.2]
Analysis 9.2. Comparison 9 Sample size, Outcome 2 Physical function.
[Analysis 10.1]
Analysis 10.1. Comparison 10 Clinical Relevance, Outcome 1 WOMAC Pain.
[Analysis 10.2]
Analysis 10.2. Comparison 10 Clinical Relevance, Outcome 2 VAS Pain.
[Analysis 10.3]
Analysis 10.3. Comparison 10 Clinical Relevance, Outcome 3 WOMAC Function.
View Full Article (HTML) Summary (57K)Standard (508K)Full (784K)