Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Mannitol and other osmotic diuretics as adjuncts for treating cerebral malaria

  1. Christy AN Okoromah2,*,
  2. Bosede B Afolabi3,
  3. Emma CB Wall4

Editorial Group: Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group

Published Online: 13 APR 2011

Assessed as up-to-date: 22 NOV 2010

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004615.pub3

How to Cite

Okoromah CAN, Afolabi BB, Wall ECB. Mannitol and other osmotic diuretics as adjuncts for treating cerebral malaria. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004615. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004615.pub3.

Author Information

  1. 2

    College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria

  2. 3

    University of Lagos, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lagos, Nigeria

  3. 4

    Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, International Health Group, Liverpool, UK

*Christy AN Okoromah, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Surulere, Lagos, Lagos, PMB 12003, Nigeria. faimer2004_christy@yahoo.com.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New search for studies and content updated (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 13 APR 2011

SEARCH

 
Characteristics of included studies [ordered by study ID]

MethodsRandomized controlled trial


ParticipantsChildren aged 6-60 months with WHO definition of cerebral malaria


InterventionsMannitol 20% (5 mg/kg) intravenously over 20 minutes compared with placebo (matched volume of saline 0.9%)


OutcomesPrimary outcome measures: death, hypersensitivity and vomiting

Secondary outcome measures: median time to regain consciousness.

Length of stay, requirements for ventilation and cardio-pulmonary resuscitation were not reported.


Notes


Risk of bias

ItemAuthors' judgementDescription

Adequate sequence generation?YesQuote:"Study numbers were computer generated
and sent to the manufacturer for labelling of the drug bottles".

Comment: probably done

Allocation concealment?YesQuote:"Randomization was done in blocks of variable sizes
(4–10) to ensure equal distribution in each group"

Comment: probably done

Blinding?
All outcomes
YesQuote:"The caretakers and investigators were blinded to group
assignments"

Comment: no detail of blinding or matching of placebo given. Probably adequate

Incomplete outcome data addressed?
All outcomes
UnclearQuote:"Twenty two children died and one was lost to follow up.
Since the analysis was by intention to treat, this patient
was assigned the worst possible outcome (death)."

Comment: incomplete outcome data addressed in the analysis

Free of selective reporting?YesAll outcome measures reported

Free of other bias?YesNo other bias identified

 
Comparison 1. Mannitol versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup titleNo. of studiesNo. of participantsStatistical methodEffect size

 1 Death1156Risk Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI)0.81 [0.38, 1.74]

 
Summary of findings for the main comparison.

Mannitol compared with placebo for cerebral malaria

Patient or population: Children aged 6-60 months with cerebral malaria

Settings: Malaria endemic countries

Intervention: Intravenous mannitol administered at the same time as commencing intravenous quinine

Comparison: Placebo (5 mL/kg of saline 0.9% administered in the same way as mannitol)

OutcomesIllustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)Relative effect
(95% CI)
No of participants
(studies)
Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)
Comments

Assumed riskCorresponding risk

PlaceboMannitol

Death162 per 1000132 per 1000
(62 to 284)
RR 0.81
(0.38-1.74)
156
(1 study1)
low2,3,4,5

Major neurological sequelae----Not reported

Coma recovery time-156
(1 study1)
low2,3,6,7

Time to hospital discharge----Not reported

Need for ventilation----Not reported

Need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation----Not reported

Adverse events00156
(1 study1)
low3,4,5,6

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

 1 Only one randomized controlled trial of mannitol compared to placebo in children with cerebral malaria has been conducted (Namutangula 2007)
2 No serious study limitations. This study adequately randomized participants, and blinded participants to be considered at low risk of bias. The method of allocation concealment was not clearly stated but was probably done
3 No serious inconsistency. Not applicable as only one study
4 No serious indirectness. Children aged 6-60 months who met the WHO case definition of cerebral malaria were included. Children with renal disease, cardiac failure or pulmonary congestion were excluded. 5 mL/kg of 20% mannitol (1 g/kg) or 5 mL/kg of saline as matched placebo were administered in a single dose over 20 minutes at the same time as parenteral quinine.
5 Very serious imprecision. This study is not adequately powered to detect a clinically important effect on mortality. The 95% CI is wide and includes both appreciable benefit and harm with mannitol.
6 Serious indirectness. This outcome is an indirect or surrogate indicator for poor outcomes, and on its own is not informative.
7 Serious imprecision. The article presents median times to regain conciousness, to oral intake, to sit unsupported and total coma time. The differences between the groups are not statistically significant (P > 0.05).