Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women

  1. Jane Sandall1,*,
  2. Hora Soltani2,
  3. Simon Gates3,
  4. Andrew Shennan1,
  5. Declan Devane4

Editorial Group: Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group

Published Online: 21 AUG 2013

Assessed as up-to-date: 22 JUL 2013

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub3


How to Cite

Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 8. Art. No.: CD004667. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub3.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Women's Health Academic Centre, King's Health Partners, Division of Women's Health, King's College, London, London, UK

  2. 2

    Sheffield Hallam University, Centre for Health and Social Care Research Centre, Sheffield, UK

  3. 3

    Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, UK

  4. 4

    National University of Ireland Galway, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Galway, Ireland

*Jane Sandall, Division of Women's Health, King's College, London, Women's Health Academic Centre, King's Health Partners, 10th Floor, North Wing, St. Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK. jane.sandall@kcl.ac.uk.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions), comment added to review
  2. Published Online: 21 AUG 2013

SEARCH

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Hannah Rayment-Jones, Trevor Murrells, Jane Sandall, An investigation of the relationship between the caseload model of midwifery for socially disadvantaged women and childbirth outcomes using routine data – A retrospective, observational study, Midwifery, 2015, 31, 4, 409

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Viola Burau, Charlotte Overgaard, Caseload midwifery as organisational change: the interplay between professional and organisational projects in Denmark, BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth, 2015, 15, 1

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Michelle M. Butler, Lucille Sheehy, Mary (Maureen) Kington, Maura C. Walsh, Mary C. Brosnan, Martina Murphy, Corina Naughton, Jonathan Drennan, Theresa Barry, Evaluating midwife-led antenatal care: Choice, experience, effectiveness, and preparation for pregnancy, Midwifery, 2015, 31, 4, 418

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Andrew Symon, Clare Winter, Lynda Cochrane, Exploration of preterm birth rates associated with different models of antenatal midwifery care in Scotland: Unmatched retrospective cohort analysis, Midwifery, 2015, 31, 6, 590

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Kate Dawson, Michelle Newton, Della Forster, Helen McLachlan, Exploring midwifery students׳ views and experiences of caseload midwifery: A cross-sectional survey conducted in Victoria, Australia, Midwifery, 2015, 31, 2, e7

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Nola Wong, Jenny Browne, Sally Ferguson, Jan Taylor, Deborah Davis, Getting the first birth right: A retrospective study of outcomes for low-risk primiparous women receiving standard care versus midwifery model of care in the same tertiary hospital, Women and Birth, 2015,

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    M. Wilmore, D. Rodger, S. Humphreys, V.L. Clifton, J. Dalton, M. Flabouris, A. Skuse, How midwives tailor health information used in antenatal care, Midwifery, 2015, 31, 1, 74

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Kate Young, Yvette D. Miller, Keeping it Natural: Does Persuasive Magazine Content Have an Effect on Young Women’s Intentions for Birth?, Women & Health, 2015, 55, 4, 447

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Amanda G. Carter, Elizabeth Wilkes, Jenny Gamble, Mary Sidebotham, Debra K. Creedy, Midwifery students׳ experiences of an innovative clinical placement model embedded within midwifery continuity of care in Australia, Midwifery, 2015, 31, 8, 765

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Lesley J. Kuliukas, Lucy Lewis, Yvonne L. Hauck, Ravani Duggan, Midwives’ experiences of transfer in labour from a Western Australian birth centre to a tertiary maternity hospital, Women and Birth, 2015,

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Mary Sidebotham, Jennifer Fenwick, Susan Rath, Jenny Gamble, Midwives’ perceptions of their role within the context of maternity service reform: An Appreciative Inquiry, Women and Birth, 2015, 28, 2, 112

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Geoff P. Lovell, Angela Huntsman, Jodie Hedley-Ward, Psychological distress, depression, anxiety, stress, and exercise in Australian and New Zealand mothers: A cross-sectional survey, Nursing & Health Sciences, 2015, 17, 1
  13. 13
    Suzanne King, Sue Kildea, Marie-Paule Austin, Alain Brunet, Vanessa E Cobham, Paul A Dawson, Mark Harris, Elizabeth M Hurrion, David P Laplante, Brett M McDermott, H David McIntyre, Michael W O’Hara, Norbert Schmitz, Helen Stapleton, Sally K Tracy, Cathy Vaillancourt, Kelsey N Dancause, Sue Kruske, Nicole Reilly, Laura Shoo, Gabrielle Simcock, Anne-Marie Turcotte-Tremblay, Erin Yong Ping, QF2011: a protocol to study the effects of the Queensland flood on pregnant women, their pregnancies, and their children's early development, BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth, 2015, 15, 1

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    E. Wilkes, J. Gamble, Ghazala Adam, D.K. Creedy, Reforming maternity services in Australia: Outcomes of a private practice midwifery service, Midwifery, 2015,

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    C.L. Harrison, C.B. Lombard, C. East, J. Boyle, H.J. Teede, Risk stratification in early pregnancy for women at increased risk of gestational diabetes, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 2015, 107, 1, 61

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Sally Ferguson, Deborah Davis, Jenny Browne, Jan Taylor, Sense of coherence and childbearing choices: A cross sectional survey, Midwifery, 2015,

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Ingegerd Hildingsson, Jennifer Fenwick, Swedish midwives' perception of their practice environment – A cross sectional study, Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 2015,

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Judith Shaw, Soo Downe, Carol Kingdon, Systematic mixed-methods review of interventions, outcomes and experiences for imprisoned pregnant women, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2015, 71, 7
  19. 19
    Amie Steel, Jon Adams, Jane Frawley, Alex Broom, David Sibbritt, The characteristics of women who birth at home, in a birth centre or in a hospital labour ward: A study of a nationally-representative sample of 1835 pregnant women, Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 2015,

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Ank de Jonge, Raymond de Vries, Antoine L. M. Lagro-Janssen, Address Malata, Eugene Declercq, Soo Downe, Eileen K. Hutton, The Importance of Evaluating Primary Midwifery Care for Improving the Health of Women and Infants, Frontiers in Medicine, 2015, 2,

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Clare Davison, Yvonne L. Hauck, Sara J. Bayes, Lesley J. Kuliukas, Jennifer Wood, The relationship is everything: Women׳s reasons for choosing a privately practising midwife in Western Australia, Midwifery, 2015, 31, 8, 772

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Mary Anne Biro, Jane Susanne Yelland, Stephanie Janne Brown, Who is holding the baby? Women's experiences of contact with their baby immediately after birth: An Australian population-based survey, Women and Birth, 2015,

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Jenny Browne, Jan Taylor, ‘It's a good thing…’: Women's views on their continuity experiences with midwifery students from one Australian region, Midwifery, 2014, 30, 3, e108

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Jenny Kelly, Roianne West, Jennifer Gamble, Mary Sidebotham, Vicki Carson, Elaine Duffy, ‘She knows how we feel’: Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander childbearing women's experience of Continuity of Care with an Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander midwifery student, Women and Birth, 2014, 27, 3, 157

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Mariko Iida, Shigeko Horiuchi, Kumiko Nagamori, A comparison of midwife-led care versus obstetrician-led care for low-risk women in Japan, Women and Birth, 2014, 27, 3, 202

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Shona Dove, Eimear Muir-Cochrane, Being safe practitioners and safe mothers: A critical ethnography of continuity of care midwifery in Australia, Midwifery, 2014, 30, 10, 1063

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    Tekoa L. King, Whitney Pinger, Evidence-Based Practice for Intrapartum Care: The Pearls of Midwifery, Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 2014, 59, 6
  28. 28
    Marie Tarrant, Joan E. Dodgson, Kendra M. Wu, Factors contributing to early breast-feeding cessation among Chinese mothers: An exploratory study, Midwifery, 2014, 30, 10, 1088

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Petra ten Hoope-Bender, Luc de Bernis, James Campbell, Soo Downe, Vincent Fauveau, Helga Fogstad, Caroline S E Homer, Holly Powell Kennedy, Zoe Matthews, Alison McFadden, Mary J Renfrew, Wim Van Lerberghe, Improvement of maternal and newborn health through midwifery, The Lancet, 2014, 384, 9949, 1226

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    Mary J Renfrew, Alison McFadden, Maria Helena Bastos, James Campbell, Andrew Amos Channon, Ngai Fen Cheung, Deborah Rachel Audebert Delage Silva, Soo Downe, Holly Powell Kennedy, Address Malata, Felicia McCormick, Laura Wick, Eugene Declercq, Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care, The Lancet, 2014, 384, 9948, 1129

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    Jane Menke, Jennifer Fenwick, Jenny Gamble, Hazel Brittain, Debra K. Creedy, Midwives' perceptions of organisational structures and processes influencing their ability to provide caseload care to socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women, Midwifery, 2014, 30, 10, 1096

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    Lyn Ebert, Helen Bellchambers, Alison Ferguson, Jenny Browne, Socially disadvantaged women's views of barriers to feeling safe to engage in decision-making in maternity care, Women and Birth, 2014, 27, 2, 132

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Jane Sandall, Trevor Murrells, Miranda Dodwell, Rod Gibson, Susan Bewley, Kirstie Coxon, Debra Bick, Graham Cookson, Cathy Warwick, Diana Hamilton-Fairley, The efficient use of the maternity workforce and the implications for safety and quality in maternity care: a population-based, cross-sectional study, Health Services and Delivery Research, 2014, 2, 38, 1

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Christine Catling, Hannah Dahlen, Caroline S.E. Homer, The influences on women who choose publicly-funded home birth in Australia, Midwifery, 2014, 30, 7, 892

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    Caroline S E Homer, Ingrid K Friberg, Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias, Petra ten Hoope-Bender, Jane Sandall, Anna Maria Speciale, Linda A Bartlett, The projected effect of scaling up midwifery, The Lancet, 2014, 384, 9948, 1146

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Joanne V. Welsh, Andrew G. Symon, Unique and proforma birth plans: A qualitative exploration of midwives׳ experiences, Midwifery, 2014, 30, 7, 885

    CrossRef

  37. 37
    Gabrielle Stevens, Rachel Thompson, Sue Kruske, Bernadette Watson, Yvette D. Miller, What are pregnant women told about models of maternity care in Australia? A retrospective study of women's reports, Patient Education and Counseling, 2014, 97, 1, 114

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Hannah Grace Dahlen, Shea Caplice, What do midwives fear?, Women and Birth, 2014, 27, 4, 266

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Petra ten Hoope-Bender, Continuity of maternity carer for all women, The Lancet, 2013, 382, 9906, 1685

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    Current education standards are essential for midwives to be capable of functioning to their full scope of practice, Women and Birth, 2013, 26, 4, 223

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Cecily M Begley, Gillian ML Gyte, Declan Devane, William McGuire, Andrew Weeks, Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour, The Cochrane Library,
  42. 42
    Christine J Catling, Nancy Medley, Maralyn Foureur, Clare Ryan, Nicky Leap, Alison Teate, Caroline SE Homer, Group versus conventional antenatal care for women, The Cochrane Library,
  43. 43
    Tarun Gera, Is there randomized controlled trial evidence to support the use of midwife-led continuity models instead of other models of care in childbearing women?, Cochrane Clinical Answers,