Intervention Protocol

Endotracheal intubation versus face mask for newborns resuscitated with positive pressure ventilation at birth

  1. Colm PF O'Donnell1,*,
  2. Peter G Davis2,
  3. Colin J Morley3

Editorial Group: Cochrane Neonatal Group

Published Online: 18 OCT 2004

Assessed as up-to-date: 24 JUN 2004

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004948


How to Cite

O'Donnell CPF, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Endotracheal intubation versus face mask for newborns resuscitated with positive pressure ventilation at birth (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004948. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004948.

Author Information

  1. 1

    The National Maternity Hospital, Dublin 2, Ireland

  2. 2

    Royal Women's Hospital, Department of Paediatrics, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

  3. 3

    Royal Women's Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , Carlton, Victoria, Australia

*Colm PF O'Donnell, The National Maternity Hospital, Holles Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. codonnell@nmh.ie.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 18 OCT 2004

SEARCH

 

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows:

In newly born infants resuscitated with intermittent positive pressure ventilation, does PPV via an endotracheal tube as compared to a face mask reduce mortality and morbidity?

Planned subgroup analyses:

  • gestational age: term (37 weeks gestation and above), preterm (less than 37 weeks) infants
  • professional category or experience of resuscitator