Intervention Review

Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia

  1. Alex J Shortt1,*,
  2. Bruce DS Allan2,
  3. Jennifer R Evans3

Editorial Group: Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group

Published Online: 31 JAN 2013

Assessed as up-to-date: 15 NOV 2012

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005135.pub3


How to Cite

Shortt AJ, Allan BDS, Evans JR. Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD005135. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005135.pub3.

Author Information

  1. 1

    The Moorfields Eye Hospital/UCL Institute of Ophthalmology National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK

  2. 2

    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, External Disease Service, London, UK

  3. 3

    London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group, ICEH, London, UK

*Alex J Shortt, The Moorfields Eye Hospital/UCL Institute of Ophthalmology National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, 162 City Road, London, EC1V 2PD, UK. a.shortt@ucl.ac.uk.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New search for studies and content updated (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 31 JAN 2013

SEARCH

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Jocelyn Kuryan, Anjum Cheema, Roy S Chuck, Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for the correction of myopia, The Cochrane Library,