Intervention Review

Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids

  1. Kathleen J Lumb2,
  2. Patrick H.D. Colquhoun2,
  3. Richard Malthaner3,
  4. Shiva Jayaraman1,*

Editorial Group: Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group

Published Online: 8 OCT 2008

Assessed as up-to-date: 15 MAR 2010

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005393.pub2

Database Title

Additional Information

How to Cite

Lumb KJ, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner R, Jayaraman S. Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD005393. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005393.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    University of Toronto, Department of Surgery, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

  2. 2

    University of Western Ontario, Department of Surgery, London, Canada

  3. 3

    The University of Western Ontario, Division of Thoracic Surgery, London, Ontario, Canada

*Shiva Jayaraman, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, St. Joseph's Health Centre, 30 The Queensway, Suite 221, Toronto, Ontario, M6R 1B5, Canada. jayars@stjoe.on.ca. shivaj76@yahoo.ca.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New search for studies and content updated (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 8 OCT 2008

SEARCH

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Summary (60K)Standard (273K)Full (441K)

  1. Current Version

    Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids

    Kathleen J Lumb, Patrick H.D. Colquhoun, Richard Malthaner and Shiva Jayaraman

    Article first published online: 8 OCT 2008 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005393.pub2

Previous versions of this article and their online publication dates

  1. Version 1

    Circular stapled anopexy versus excisional hemorrhoidectomy for hemorrhoidal disease

    S Jayaraman, PHD Colquhoun and RA Malthaner

    Article first published online: 19 JUL 2006 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005393

View Full Article (HTML) Summary (60K)Standard (273K)Full (441K)