Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema
Editorial Group: Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group
Published Online: 3 DEC 2013
Assessed as up-to-date: 30 AUG 2013
Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
How to Cite
Gharaibeh A, Savage HI, Scherer RW, Goldberg MF, Lindsley K. Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD005431. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005431.pub3.
- Publication Status: New search for studies and content updated (no change to conclusions)
- Published Online: 3 DEC 2013
Traumatic hyphema is the entry of blood into the anterior chamber (the space between the cornea and iris) subsequent to a blow or a projectile striking the eye. Hyphema uncommonly causes permanent loss of vision. Associated trauma (e.g. corneal staining, traumatic cataract, angle recession glaucoma, optic atrophy, etc.) may seriously affect vision. Such complications may lead to permanent impairment of vision. Patients with sickle cell trait/disease may be particularly susceptible to increases of elevated intraocular pressure. If rebleeding occurs, the rates and severity of complications increase.
To assess the effectiveness of various medical interventions in the management of traumatic hyphema.
We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 8), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to August 2013), EMBASE (January 1980 to August 2013), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 30 August 2013.
Two authors independently assessed the titles and abstracts of all reports identified by the electronic and manual searches. In this review, we included randomized and quasi-randomized trials that compared various medical interventions versus other medical interventions or control groups for the treatment of traumatic hyphema following closed globe trauma. We applied no restrictions regarding age, gender, severity of the closed globe trauma, or level of visual acuity at the time of enrolment.
Data collection and analysis
Two authors independently extracted the data for the primary and secondary outcomes. We entered and analyzed data using Review Manager 5. We performed meta-analyses using a fixed-effect model and reported dichotomous outcomes as odds ratios and continuous outcomes as mean differences.
We included 20 randomized and seven quasi-randomized studies with 2643 participants in this review. Interventions included antifibrinolytic agents (oral and systemic aminocaproic acid, tranexamic acid, and aminomethylbenzoic acid), corticosteroids (systemic and topical), cycloplegics, miotics, aspirin, conjugated estrogens, traditional Chinese medicine, monocular versus bilateral patching, elevation of the head, and bed rest. No intervention had a significant effect on visual acuity whether measured at two weeks or less after the trauma or at longer time periods. The number of days for the primary hyphema to resolve appeared to be longer with the use of aminocaproic acid compared with no use, but was not altered by any other intervention.
Systemic aminocaproic acid reduced the rate of recurrent hemorrhage (odds ratio (OR) 0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11 to 0.57), but a sensitivity analysis omitting studies not using an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis reduced the strength of the evidence (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.09). We obtained similar results for topical aminocaproic acid (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.10). We found tranexamic acid had a significant effect in reducing the rate of secondary hemorrhage (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.49), as did aminomethylbenzoic acid as reported in one study (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.32). The evidence to support an associated reduction in the risk of complications from secondary hemorrhage (i.e. corneal bloodstaining, peripheral anterior synechiae, elevated intraocular pressure, and development of optic atrophy) by antifibrinolytics was limited by the small number of these events. Use of aminocaproic acid was associated with increased nausea, vomiting, and other adverse events compared with placebo. We found no difference in the number of adverse events with the use of systemic versus topical aminocaproic acid or with standard versus lower drug dose.
The available evidence on usage of corticosteroids, cycloplegics, or aspirin in traumatic hyphema was limited due to the small numbers of participants and events in the trials.
We found no difference in effect between a single versus binocular patch or ambulation versus complete bed rest on the risk of secondary hemorrhage or time to rebleed.
Traumatic hyphema in the absence of other intraocular injuries uncommonly leads to permanent loss of vision. Complications resulting from secondary hemorrhage could lead to permanent impairment of vision, especially in patients with sickle cell trait/disease. We found no evidence to show an effect on visual acuity by any of the interventions evaluated in this review. Although evidence was limited, it appears that patients with traumatic hyphema who receive aminocaproic acid or tranexamic acid are less likely to experience secondary hemorrhaging. However, hyphema in patients treated with aminocaproic acid take longer to clear.
Other than the possible benefits of antifibrinolytic usage to reduce the rate of secondary hemorrhage, the decision to use corticosteroids, cycloplegics, or nondrug interventions (such as binocular patching, bed rest, or head elevation) should remain individualized because no solid scientific evidence supports a benefit. As these multiple interventions are rarely used in isolation, further research to assess the additive effect of these interventions might be of value.
Plain language summary
Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema
We reviewed the evidence about the effect of medical interventions for treating people with traumatic hyphema.
Traumatic hyphema is the entry of blood into the space between the cornea (clear outer layer of the eye) and iris (colored disc behind the cornea) following a blow to the eye. Along with the appearance of blood, there may be one or more major injuries to the eye from the trauma, which could result in loss of vision. In most cases, the blood is absorbed, but in some cases, there is a secondary hemorrhage (the appearance of fresh blood in the eye after the initial trauma). Complications resulting from secondary hemorrhage include glaucoma, corneal bloodstaining, or damage to the optic nerve (the nerve that carries visual information from the eye to the brain). These complications also can result in permanent loss of vision.
We searched scientific databases up to August 2013 and found 20 randomized controlled trials and seven quasi-randomized trials (trials where people were not allocated randomly but another method of grouping was used, e.g. date of birth, person's medical record number) relevant to this review. The 27 trials included 2643 total participants. Most trials included participants from all age groups and had more men than women. Outcomes mostly were examined at one week post-treatment (ranging up to three years afterwards).
Key results and quality of evidence
Antifibrinolytic drugs are often used to treat traumatic hyphema and are thought to be effective, because they delay absorption of blood clots until complete healing of the damaged blood vessels takes place. This review found that antifibrinolytics did not affect final vision, but did appear to reduce the risk of secondary bleeding. However, patients taking one of the antifibrinolytics, aminocaproic acid, appeared to have more nausea and vomiting compared with control patients. Two other antifibrinolytics, tranexamic acid and aminomethylbenzoic acid, also reduced the risk of secondary hemorrhage, but there was limited information about side effects. It was unclear whether these medications reduced complications of secondary hemorrhage, because these events did not occur often in the studies.
Other medications evaluated in trials included corticosteroids, either taken internally or applied as eyedrops; estrogens; and other kinds of eyedrops. Nondrug interventions included wearing a patch on one or both eyes, moderate activity versus bed rest, and elevation of the head versus laying flat. Because the number of participants and events were small, the evidence for a beneficial effect of any of these interventions is inconclusive.