Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Nutritional screening for improving professional practice for patient outcomes in hospital and primary care settings

  1. Amir-Houshang Omidvari1,
  2. Yasaman Vali2,3,
  3. Susan M Murray4,
  4. David Wonderling5,
  5. Arash Rashidian6,7,*

Editorial Group: Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group

Published Online: 6 JUN 2013

Assessed as up-to-date: 29 MAY 2013

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005539.pub2


How to Cite

Omidvari AH, Vali Y, Murray SM, Wonderling D, Rashidian A. Nutritional screening for improving professional practice for patient outcomes in hospital and primary care settings. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 6. Art. No.: CD005539. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005539.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Knowledge Utilization Research Center (KURC), Tehran, Tehran, Iran

  2. 2

    Tehran University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Tehran, Iran

  3. 3

    Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Knowledge Utilization Research Center (KURC), Tehran, Iran

  4. 4

    Royal College of Physicians, London, UK

  5. 5

    Royal College of Physicians, National Clinical Guideline Centre, London, UK

  6. 6

    Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran, Iran

  7. 7

    Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Knowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran, Iran

*Arash Rashidian, Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Poursina Ave, Tehran, 1417613191, Iran. rashidiana@who.int. arash.rashidian@gmail.com.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Stable (no update expected for reasons given in 'What's new')
  2. Published Online: 6 JUN 2013

SEARCH

[Figure 1]
Figure 1. Flowchart of search process.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2. Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3. Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.