Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

T-tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

  1. Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy*,
  2. Rahul Koti,
  3. Brian R Davidson

Editorial Group: Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group

Published Online: 21 JUN 2013

Assessed as up-to-date: 10 APR 2013

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005641.pub3


How to Cite

Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Davidson BR. T-tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 6. Art. No.: CD005641. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005641.pub3.

Author Information

  1. Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, Department of Surgery, London, UK

*Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Department of Surgery, Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Hospital,, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK. kurinchi2k@hotmail.com.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New search for studies and content updated (conclusions changed)
  2. Published Online: 21 JUN 2013

SEARCH

References

References to studies included in this review

  1. References to studies included in this review
  2. References to studies excluded from this review
  3. Additional references
  4. References to other published versions of this review
El-Geidie 2010 {published data only}
Leida 2008 {published data only}
  • Leida Z, Ping B, Shuguang W, Yu H. A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy. Surgical Endoscopy 2008; Vol. 22, issue 7:1595-600. [1432-2218: (Electronic)]
  • Zhang LD, Bie P, Chen P, Wang SG, Ma KS, Dong JH. [Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage following laparoscopic choledochotomy]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2004;42(9):520-3.
Zhang 2009 {published data only}
  • Zhang WJ, Xu GF, Wu GZ, Li JM, Dong ZT, Mo XD. Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with primary closure versus T-tube drainage: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Surgical Research 2009; Vol. 157, issue 1:e1-e5. [1095-8673: (Electronic)]

References to studies excluded from this review

  1. References to studies included in this review
  2. References to studies excluded from this review
  3. Additional references
  4. References to other published versions of this review
Ha 2004 {published data only}
  • Ha JP, Tang CN, Siu WT, Chau CH, Li MK. Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones. Hepatogastroenterology 2004;51(60):1605-8.
Jameel 2008 {published data only}
Noh 2009 {published data only}
  • Noh KT, Min SK, Lee HK. Comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage following laparoscopic CBD exploration. Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 2009; Vol. 77, issue 6:399-403.

Additional references

  1. References to studies included in this review
  2. References to studies excluded from this review
  3. Additional references
  4. References to other published versions of this review
Attili 1995
Ballal 2009
Bates 1992
Bernstein 1994
Brok 2008
  • Brok J, Thorlund K, Gluud C, Wetterslev J. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61:763-9.
Brok 2009
  • Brok J, Thorlund K, Wetterslev J, Gluud C. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive - Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38(1):287-98.
Burhenne 1973
Chan 2013
  • Chan AW,  Tetzlaff JM,  Altman DG,  Laupacis A,  Gøtzsche PC,  Krleža-Jerić K,  et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013;158(3):200-7.
Clavien 2009
  • Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Annals of Surgery 2009;250(2):187-96.
CTU 2011
  • Copenhagen Trial Unit. TSA - Trial Sequential Analysis. http://ctu.dk/tsa/ 2011 (accessed 25 April 2013).
Decker 2003
  • Decker G, Borie F, Millat B, Berthou JC, Deleuze A, Drouard F, et al. One hundred laparoscopic choledochotomies with primary closure of the common bile duct. Surgical Endoscopy 2003;17(1):12-8.
DeMets 1987
DerSimonian 1986
Dindo 2004
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of Surgery 2004;240(2):205-13.
Dolan 2009
  • Dolan JP, Diggs BS, Sheppard BC, Hunter JG. The national mortality burden and significant factors associated with open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: 1997-2006. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2009;13(12):2292-301.
Duensing 2000
  • Duensing RA, Williams RA, Collins JC, Wilson SE. Common bile duct stone characteristics: correlation with treatment choice during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2000;4(1):6-12.
Ebner 2004
Egger 1997
Gluud 2013
  • Gluud C, Nikolova D, Klingenberg SL, Alexakis N, Als-Nielsen B, Colli A, et al. Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group. About The Cochrane Collaboration (Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs)). 2013, Issue 3. Art. No.: LIVER.
GREPCO 1984
  • GREPCO. Prevalence of gallstone disease in an Italian adult female population. Rome group for the epidemiology and prevention of cholelithiasis (GREPCO). American Journal of Epidemiology 1984;119(5):796-805.
GREPCO 1988
  • GREPCO. The epidemiology of gallstone disease in Rome, Italy. Part I. Prevalence data in men. The Rome group for epidemiology and prevention of cholelithiasis (GREPCO). Hepatology 1988;8(4):904-6.
Griniatsos 2005
  • Griniatsos J, Karvounis E, Arbuckle J, Isla AM. Cost-effective method for laparoscopic choledochotomy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 2005;75(1-2):35-8.
Gurusamy 2009
Gurusamy 2011
Gurusamy 2013
  • Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Samraj K, Davidson BR. T-tube drainage versus primary closure after open common bile duct stone exploration. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005640]
Halldestam 2004
Hemli 2004
HES 2011
  • HESonline. Hospital Episode Statistics. Main procedures and interventions: 3 character. http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/Ease/servlet/ContentServer?siteID=1937&categoryID=205 2011 (accessed on 25 April 2013).
Higgins 2002
Higgins 2011
  • Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
Hyser 1999
ICH-GCP 1997
  • International Conference on Harmonisation Expert Working Group. International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline. Guideline for good clinical practice1997 CFR & ICH Guidelines. Vol. 1, PA 19063-2043, USA: Barnett International/PAREXEL, 1997.
Isla 2004
Jacobs 1991
  • Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Laparoscopic choledocholithotomy. Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery 1991;1(2):79-82.
Kacker 1995
  • Kacker LK, Mittal BR, Sikora SS, Ali W, Kapoor VK, Saxena R, et al. Bile leak after T-tube removal - a scintigraphic study. Hepato-gastroenterology 1995;42(6):975-8.
Kama 2001
  • Kama NA, Atli M, Doganay M, Kologlu M, Reis E, Dolapci M. Practical recommendations for the prediction and management of common bile duct stones in patients with gallstones. Surgical Endoscopy 2001;15(9):942-5.
Kim 2004
Kjaergard 2001
Livingston 2004
Lundh 2012
Lygidakis 1983
  • Lygidakis NJ. Choledochotomy for biliary lithiasis: T-tube drainage or primary closure. Effects on postoperative bacteremia and T-tube bile infection. American Journal of Surgery 1983;146(2):254-6.
Macaskill 2001
Memon 2000
Moher 1998
  • Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?. Lancet 1998;352(9128):609-13.
Newell 1992
Ng 1999
  • Ng T, Amaral JF. Timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of choledocolithiasis. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques 1999;9(1):31-7.
NIH 1992
  • NIH consensus statement on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement September 14-16, 1992. http://consensus.nih.gov/1992/1992GallstonesLaparoscopy090html.htm 1992 (accessed 25 April 2013).
Pitluk 1979
RevMan 2012 [Computer program]
  • The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
Rojas-Ortega 2003
  • Rojas-Ortega S, Arizpe-Bravo D, Marin Lopez ER, Cesin-Sanchez R, Roman GR, Gomez C. Transcystic common bile duct exploration in the management of patients with choledocholithiasis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2003;7(4):492-6.
Royle 2003
  • Royle P, Milne R. Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2003;19(4):591-603.
Sarli 2003
  • Sarli L, Iusco DR, Roncoroni L. Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: 10-year experience. World Journal of Surgery 2003;27(2):180-6.
Savovic 2012
  • Savovic J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Juni P, Pildal J, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2012;157(6):429-38.
Schulz 1995
  • Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273(5):408-12.
Snow 1999
  • Snow LL, Weinstein LS, Hannon JK, Lane DR. Management of bile duct stones in 1572 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. American Surgeon 1999;65(6):530-47.
Strasberg 1993
Thompson 2002
Thorlund 2009
  • Thorlund K, Devereaux PJ, Wetterslev J, Guyatt G, Ioannidis JP, Thabane L, et al. Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38(1):276-86.
Thorlund 2010
  • Thorlund K, Anema A, Mills E. Interpreting meta-analysis according to the adequacy of sample size. An example using isoniazid chemoprophylaxis for tuberculosis in purified protein derivative negative HIV-infected individuals. Clinical Epidemiology 2010;2:57-66.
Thorlund 2011
  • Thorlund K, Engstrøm J, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Imberger G, Gluud C. User manual forTrial Sequential Analysis (TSA). http://ctu.dk/tsa/files/tsa_manual.pdf 2011 (accessed 25 April 2013).
Waage 2003
Wetterslev 2008
  • Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61(1):64-75.
Wetterslev 2009
Williams 1994
Wills 2002
Wood 2008
  • Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Juni P, Altman DG, et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2008;336(7644):601-5. [PUBMED: 18316340]

References to other published versions of this review

  1. References to studies included in this review
  2. References to studies excluded from this review
  3. Additional references
  4. References to other published versions of this review
Gurusamy 2006
Gurusamy 2007
  • Gurusamy KS, Samraj K. Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct stone exploration. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005641.pub2]