Intervention Review

Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus

  1. Ahmed AL-Khamis2,
  2. Iain McCallum3,
  3. Peter M King4,
  4. Julie Bruce1,*

Editorial Group: Cochrane Wounds Group

Published Online: 20 JAN 2010

Assessed as up-to-date: 21 OCT 2009

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub3


How to Cite

AL-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD006213. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub3.

Author Information

  1. 1

    University of Warwick, Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, UK

  2. 2

    University of Aberdeen, c/o Section of Population Health, Aberdeen, UK

  3. 3

    Queen Elizabeth Hospital, General Surgery, Gateshead, UK

  4. 4

    Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Ward 31, Aberdeen, UK

*Julie Bruce, Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Rd, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. julie.bruce@warwick.ac.uk.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 20 JAN 2010

SEARCH

  1. Current Version

    Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus

    Ahmed AL-Khamis, Iain McCallum, Peter M King and Julie Bruce

    Article first published online: 20 JAN 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub3

Previous versions of this article and their online publication dates

  1. Version 2

    Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus

    Iain McCallum, Peter M King, Julie Bruce and Ahmed AL-Khamis

    Article first published online: 17 OCT 2007 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub2

  2. Version 1

    Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus

    I McCallum, J Bruce and PM King

    Article first published online: 18 OCT 2006 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006213