Intervention Review

Three dimensional versus two dimensional imaging for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  1. Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy1,*,
  2. Samir Sahay2,
  3. Brian R Davidson3

Editorial Group: Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group

Published Online: 19 JAN 2011

Assessed as up-to-date: 10 OCT 2010

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006882.pub2


How to Cite

Gurusamy KS, Sahay S, Davidson BR. Three dimensional versus two dimensional imaging for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD006882. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006882.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, Department of Surgery, London, UK

  2. 2

    Royal Free Hampstead NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Surgery, London, UK

  3. 3

    Royal Free Hospital and University College School of Medicine, University Department of Surgery, London, UK

*Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Department of Surgery, Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, 9th Floor, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK. kurinchi2k@hotmail.com.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New
  2. Published Online: 19 JAN 2011

SEARCH

  1. Current Version

    Three dimensional versus two dimensional imaging for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Samir Sahay and Brian R Davidson

    Article first published online: 19 JAN 2011 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006882.pub2

Previous versions of this article and their online publication dates

  1. Version 1

    Three dimensional versus two dimensional imaging for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Kumarakrishnan Samraj and Brian R Davidson

    Article first published online: 23 JAN 2008 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006882