Intervention Review

Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section

  1. Fiona M Smaill1,*,
  2. Gillian ML Gyte2

Editorial Group: Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group

Published Online: 20 JAN 2010

Assessed as up-to-date: 5 NOV 2009

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007482.pub2

Database Title

Additional Information

How to Cite

Smaill FM, Gyte GML. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD007482. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007482.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    McMaster University, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

  2. 2

    The University of Liverpool, Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, School of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, Division of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, Liverpool, UK

*Fiona M Smaill, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Room 2N16, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5, Canada. smaill@mcmaster.ca.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New
  2. Published Online: 20 JAN 2010

SEARCH

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Summary (58K)Standard (1524K)Full (1855K)

  1. Current Version

    Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section

    Fiona M Smaill and Gillian ML Gyte

    Article first published online: 20 JAN 2010 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007482.pub2

Previous versions of this article and their online publication dates

  1. Version 1

    Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section

    Fiona M Smaill and Gillian ML Gyte

    Article first published online: 7 OCT 2009 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007482

View Full Article (HTML) Summary (58K)Standard (1524K)Full (1855K)