Intervention Review

Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries

  1. Zbys Fedorowicz1,*,
  2. Mona Nasser2,
  3. Nairn Wilson3

Editorial Group: Cochrane Oral Health Group

Published Online: 7 OCT 2009

Assessed as up-to-date: 23 JUL 2009

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007517.pub2


How to Cite

Fedorowicz Z, Nasser M, Wilson N. Adhesively bonded versus non-bonded amalgam restorations for dental caries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD007517. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007517.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Ministry of Health, Bahrain, UKCC (Bahrain Branch), Awali, Bahrain

  2. 2

    Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health care, Department of Health Information, Cologne, Germany

  3. 3

    King's College and St Thomas' Hospitals, King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's, London, UK

*Zbys Fedorowicz, UKCC (Bahrain Branch), Ministry of Health, Bahrain, Box 25438, Awali, Bahrain. zbysfedo@batelco.com.bh.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New
  2. Published Online: 7 OCT 2009

SEARCH

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Ozlem Marti Akgun, Gunseli GuvenPolat, Ahmet TuranIllca, Ceren Yildirim, Pervin Demir, Feridun Basak, Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Affect the Microleakage of Amalgam Restorations?, Iranian Journal of Radiology, 2014, 11, 3

    CrossRef