Veno-venous bypass versus none for liver transplantation

  • Protocol
  • Intervention

Authors

  • Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy,

    Corresponding author
    1. Royal Free Hospital and University College School of Medicine, University Department of Surgery, London, UK
    • Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, University Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital and University College School of Medicine, 9th Floor, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK. kurinchi2k@hotmail.com.

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Dinesh Sharma,

    1. Royal Free Hospital and University College School of Medicine, University Department of Surgery, London, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Brian R Davidson

    1. Royal Free Hospital and University College School of Medicine, University Department of Surgery, London, UK
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows:

  1. To compare the benefits and harms of veno-venous bypass (irrespective of open or percutaneous technique; heparin-coated or no heparin-coating) or meta-analysis during liver transplantation.

  2. To compare the benefits and harms of the different techniques of veno-venous bypass during liver transplantation.

Ancillary