This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (16 FEB 2017)

Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Skin-to-skin care for procedural pain in neonates

  1. Celeste Johnston1,*,
  2. Marsha Campbell-Yeo2,
  3. Ananda Fernandes3,
  4. Darlene Inglis2,
  5. David Streiner4,
  6. Rebekah Zee2

Editorial Group: Cochrane Neonatal Group

Published Online: 23 JAN 2014

Assessed as up-to-date: 16 MAY 2013

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008435.pub2


How to Cite

Johnston C, Campbell-Yeo M, Fernandes A, Inglis D, Streiner D, Zee R. Skin-to-skin care for procedural pain in neonates. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD008435. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008435.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    McGill University, Ingram School of Nursing, Quebec, Canada

  2. 2

    IWK Health Centre, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

  3. 3

    Coimbra College of Nursing, Department of Child Health, Coimbra, Portugal

  4. 4

    Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Room 3G31, Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, North York, Ontario, Canada

*Celeste Johnston, Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Quebec, H3A 2T5, Canada. celeste.johnston@mcgill.ca.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New
  2. Published Online: 23 JAN 2014

SEARCH

This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (16 FEB 2017)

[Figure 1]
Figure 1. Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
[Analysis 1.1]
Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Skin-to-skin care versus control, Outcome 1 Heart Rate during painful procedure.
[Analysis 1.2]
Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Skin-to-skin care versus control, Outcome 2 Heart rate following painful procedure.
[Analysis 1.3]
Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 Skin-to-skin care versus control, Outcome 3 HRV during painful procedure - Low frequency power.
[Analysis 1.4]
Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1 Skin-to-skin care versus control, Outcome 4 HRV during painful procedure - High frequency power.
[Analysis 1.5]
Analysis 1.5. Comparison 1 Skin-to-skin care versus control, Outcome 5 HRV during painful procedure - Low frequency to high frequency ratio.
[Analysis 1.6]
Analysis 1.6. Comparison 1 Skin-to-skin care versus control, Outcome 6 HRV after painful procedure - Low frequency power.
[Analysis 1.7]
Analysis 1.7. Comparison 1 Skin-to-skin care versus control, Outcome 7 HRV after painful procedure - High frequency power.
[Analysis 1.8]
Analysis 1.8. Comparison 1 Skin-to-skin care versus control, Outcome 8 HRV during painful procedure - Low frequency to high frequency ratio.
[Analysis 1.9]
Analysis 1.9. Comparison 1 Skin-to-skin care versus control, Outcome 9 PIPP Score 30 seconds after painful procedure.
[Analysis 1.10]
Analysis 1.10. Comparison 1 Skin-to-skin care versus control, Outcome 10 PIPP Score 60 seconds after painful procedure.
[Analysis 1.11]
Analysis 1.11. Comparison 1 Skin-to-skin care versus control, Outcome 11 PIPP Score 90 seconds after painful procedure.
[Analysis 1.12]
Analysis 1.12. Comparison 1 Skin-to-skin care versus control, Outcome 12 PIPP Score 120 seconds after painful procedure.
[Analysis 2.1]
Analysis 2.1. Comparison 2 Skin-to-skin care with different providers, Outcome 1 Heart rate recovery.
[Analysis 2.2]
Analysis 2.2. Comparison 2 Skin-to-skin care with different providers, Outcome 2 PIPP Score 30 seconds.
[Analysis 2.3]
Analysis 2.3. Comparison 2 Skin-to-skin care with different providers, Outcome 3 PIPP Score 60 seconds.
[Analysis 2.4]
Analysis 2.4. Comparison 2 Skin-to-skin care with different providers, Outcome 4 PIPP Score 90 seconds.
[Analysis 2.5]
Analysis 2.5. Comparison 2 Skin-to-skin care with different providers, Outcome 5 Pipp Score 120 Seconds.