Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Continuous versus intermittent physiological monitoring for acute stroke

  1. Alfonso Ciccone1,*,
  2. Maria Grazia Celani2,
  3. Raimondo Chiaramonte3,
  4. Cristiana Rossi4,
  5. Enrico Righetti4

Editorial Group: Cochrane Stroke Group

Published Online: 31 MAY 2013

Assessed as up-to-date: 13 AUG 2012

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008444.pub2


How to Cite

Ciccone A, Celani MG, Chiaramonte R, Rossi C, Righetti E. Continuous versus intermittent physiological monitoring for acute stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 5. Art. No.: CD008444. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008444.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    "Carlo Poma" Hospital, Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit, Mantua, Italy

  2. 2

    Azienda Ospedaliera Perugia, Neurofisiopatologia, Perugia, Umbria, Italy

  3. 3

    Rho Hospital, Emergency Department, A.O. "G. Salvini" - Garbagnate Milanese, Italy

  4. 4

    Ospedale di Città della Pieve, A USL 2 dell'Umbria, Stroke Unit, Città della Pieve, Italy

*Alfonso Ciccone, Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit, "Carlo Poma" Hospital, Strada Lago Paiolo 10, Mantua, 46100, Italy. alfonso.ciccone@aopoma.it.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New
  2. Published Online: 31 MAY 2013

SEARCH

[Figure 1]
Figure 1. Search flow diagram.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2. Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3. Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4. Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring of physiological variables, outcome: 1.1 Death or dependency by the end of scheduled follow up.
[Figure 5]
Figure 5. Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring of physiological variables, outcome: 1.2 Death at discharge.
[Analysis 1.1]
Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring of physiological variables, Outcome 1 Death or dependency by the end of scheduled follow up.
[Analysis 1.2]
Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring of physiological variables, Outcome 2 Death at discharge.
[Analysis 1.3]
Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 Continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring of physiological variables, Outcome 3 Dependency at three months or longer.
[Analysis 1.4]
Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1 Continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring of physiological variables, Outcome 4 Death from vascular causes.
[Analysis 1.5]
Analysis 1.5. Comparison 1 Continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring of physiological variables, Outcome 5 Length of stay.
[Analysis 1.6]
Analysis 1.6. Comparison 1 Continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring of physiological variables, Outcome 6 Institutional care by the end of scheduled follow up.
[Analysis 1.7]
Analysis 1.7. Comparison 1 Continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring of physiological variables, Outcome 7 Neurological complications.
[Analysis 1.8]
Analysis 1.8. Comparison 1 Continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring of physiological variables, Outcome 8 Cardiac complications.
[Analysis 1.9]
Analysis 1.9. Comparison 1 Continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring of physiological variables, Outcome 9 Pneumonia.
[Analysis 1.10]
Analysis 1.10. Comparison 1 Continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring of physiological variables, Outcome 10 Other infections.
[Analysis 1.11]
Analysis 1.11. Comparison 1 Continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring of physiological variables, Outcome 11 Deep vein thrombosis.
[Analysis 1.12]
Analysis 1.12. Comparison 1 Continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring of physiological variables, Outcome 12 Fever.
[Analysis 1.13]
Analysis 1.13. Comparison 1 Continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring of physiological variables, Outcome 13 Hypoxia.
[Analysis 1.14]
Analysis 1.14. Comparison 1 Continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring of physiological variables, Outcome 14 Hypotension.
[Analysis 1.15]
Analysis 1.15. Comparison 1 Continuous monitoring versus intermittent monitoring of physiological variables, Outcome 15 Hypertension.