Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens versus extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with posterior chamber intraocular lens for age-related cataract

  1. Samantha R de Silva1,
  2. Yasmin Riaz1,
  3. Jennifer R Evans2,*

Editorial Group: Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group

Published Online: 29 JAN 2014

Assessed as up-to-date: 13 MAY 2013

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008812.pub2


How to Cite

de Silva SR, Riaz Y, Evans JR. Phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens versus extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with posterior chamber intraocular lens for age-related cataract. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD008812. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008812.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford, UK

  2. 2

    London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group, ICEH, London, UK

*Jennifer R Evans, Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group, ICEH, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK. jennifer.evans@lshtm.ac.uk.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New
  2. Published Online: 29 JAN 2014

SEARCH

[Figure 1]
Figure 1. Types of cataract surgery
[Figure 2]
Figure 2. Study flow diagram.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3. 'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4. 'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
[Analysis 1.1]
Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Phacoemulsification versus ECCE, Outcome 1 Good functional vision at 3 months (uncorrected acuity).
[Analysis 1.2]
Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Phacoemulsification versus ECCE, Outcome 2 Good functional vision at 12 months (uncorrected acuity).
[Analysis 1.3]
Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 Phacoemulsification versus ECCE, Outcome 3 Good functional vision at 3 months (best corrected acuity).
[Analysis 1.4]
Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1 Phacoemulsification versus ECCE, Outcome 4 Good functional vision at 12 months (best corrected acuity).
[Analysis 1.5]
Analysis 1.5. Comparison 1 Phacoemulsification versus ECCE, Outcome 5 Poor visual outcome at 3 months (best corrected acuity 6/60 or worse).
[Analysis 1.6]
Analysis 1.6. Comparison 1 Phacoemulsification versus ECCE, Outcome 6 Poor visual outcome at 12 months (best corrected acuity 6/60 or worse).
[Analysis 1.7]
Analysis 1.7. Comparison 1 Phacoemulsification versus ECCE, Outcome 7 Capsular rupture.
[Analysis 1.8]
Analysis 1.8. Comparison 1 Phacoemulsification versus ECCE, Outcome 8 % corneal endothelial cell loss.
[Analysis 1.9]
Analysis 1.9. Comparison 1 Phacoemulsification versus ECCE, Outcome 9 Other intraoperative complications.
[Analysis 1.10]
Analysis 1.10. Comparison 1 Phacoemulsification versus ECCE, Outcome 10 Posterior capsule opacification.
[Analysis 1.11]
Analysis 1.11. Comparison 1 Phacoemulsification versus ECCE, Outcome 11 Retinal detachment.
[Analysis 1.12]
Analysis 1.12. Comparison 1 Phacoemulsification versus ECCE, Outcome 12 Cystoid macular oedema.
[Analysis 1.13]
Analysis 1.13. Comparison 1 Phacoemulsification versus ECCE, Outcome 13 Iris prolapse.
[Analysis 1.14]
Analysis 1.14. Comparison 1 Phacoemulsification versus ECCE, Outcome 14 Other complications.