Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Restorative justice conferencing for reducing recidivism in young offenders (aged 7 to 21)

  1. Nuala Livingstone1,*,
  2. Geraldine Macdonald1,
  3. Nicola Carr2

Editorial Group: Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Group

Published Online: 28 FEB 2013

Assessed as up-to-date: 5 MAY 2012

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008898.pub2


How to Cite

Livingstone N, Macdonald G, Carr N. Restorative justice conferencing for reducing recidivism in young offenders (aged 7 to 21). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD008898. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008898.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Child Care Research, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK

  2. 2

    Queen's University Belfast, School of Sociology, Social Policy & Social Work, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK

*Nuala Livingstone, Institute of Child Care Research, School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, 6 College Park, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT7 1LP, UK. nuala.livingstone@qub.ac.uk.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New
  2. Published Online: 28 FEB 2013

SEARCH

[Figure 1]
Figure 1. Study flow diagram
[Figure 2]
Figure 2. 'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study
[Figure 3]
Figure 3. 'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies
[Analysis 1.1]
Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Recidivism, Outcome 1 Number reoffending.
[Analysis 1.2]
Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Recidivism, Outcome 2 Post intervention monthly offending rate (any offence).
[Analysis 2.1]
Analysis 2.1. Comparison 2 Recidivism without cluster adjustment, Outcome 1 Number reoffending.
[Analysis 2.2]
Analysis 2.2. Comparison 2 Recidivism without cluster adjustment, Outcome 2 Post intervention monthly offending rate (any offence).
[Analysis 3.1]
Analysis 3.1. Comparison 3 Recidivism without imputed data or cluster adjustment, Outcome 1 Number reoffending.
[Analysis 4.1]
Analysis 4.1. Comparison 4 Recidivism (imputing positive outcome), Outcome 1 Number reoffending.
[Analysis 5.1]
Analysis 5.1. Comparison 5 Recidivism (imputing positive outcome) without cluster adjustment, Outcome 1 Number reoffending.
[Analysis 6.1]
Analysis 6.1. Comparison 6 Recidivism (without decline group), Outcome 1 Number reoffending.
[Analysis 7.1]
Analysis 7.1. Comparison 7 Recidivism (fixed-effect), Outcome 1 Number reoffending.
[Analysis 7.2]
Analysis 7.2. Comparison 7 Recidivism (fixed-effect), Outcome 2 Post intervention monthly offending rate (any offence).
[Analysis 8.1]
Analysis 8.1. Comparison 8 Young person's sense of remorse, Outcome 1 Remorse.
[Analysis 9.1]
Analysis 9.1. Comparison 9 Young person's sense of remorse without cluster adjustment, Outcome 1 Remorse.
[Analysis 10.1]
Analysis 10.1. Comparison 10 Young person's sense of remorse without imputed data of cluster adjustment, Outcome 1 Remorse.
[Analysis 11.1]
Analysis 11.1. Comparison 11 Young person's sense of remorse (imputing positive outcome), Outcome 1 Remorse.
[Analysis 12.1]
Analysis 12.1. Comparison 12 Young person's sense of remorse (imputing positive outcome) without cluster adjustment), Outcome 1 Remorse.
[Analysis 13.1]
Analysis 13.1. Comparison 13 Young person's sense of remorse (fixed-effect), Outcome 1 Remorse.
[Analysis 14.1]
Analysis 14.1. Comparison 14 Young person's recognition of wrongdoing, Outcome 1 Recognition of wrongdoing.
[Analysis 15.1]
Analysis 15.1. Comparison 15 Young person's recognition of wrongdoing without cluster adjustment, Outcome 1 Recognition of wrongdoing.
[Analysis 16.1]
Analysis 16.1. Comparison 16 Young person's recognition of wrongdoing without imputed data or cluster adjustment, Outcome 1 Recognition of wrongdoing.
[Analysis 17.1]
Analysis 17.1. Comparison 17 Young person's recognition of wrongdoing (imputing positive outcome), Outcome 1 Recognition of wrongdoing.
[Analysis 18.1]
Analysis 18.1. Comparison 18 Young person's recognition of wrongdoing (imputing positive outcome) without cluster adjustment, Outcome 1 Recognition of wrongdoing.
[Analysis 19.1]
Analysis 19.1. Comparison 19 Young person's recognition of wrongdoing (fixed-effect), Outcome 1 Recognition of wrongdoing.
[Analysis 20.1]
Analysis 20.1. Comparison 20 Young person's self-perception, Outcome 1 Self-perception.
[Analysis 21.1]
Analysis 21.1. Comparison 21 Young person's self-perception without cluster adjustment, Outcome 1 Self-perception.
[Analysis 22.1]
Analysis 22.1. Comparison 22 Young person's self-perception without imputed data or cluster adjustment, Outcome 1 Self-perception.
[Analysis 23.1]
Analysis 23.1. Comparison 23 Young person's self-perception (imputing positive outcome), Outcome 1 Self-perception.
[Analysis 24.1]
Analysis 24.1. Comparison 24 Young person's self-perception (imputing positive outcome) without cluster adjustment, Outcome 1 Self-perception.
[Analysis 25.1]
Analysis 25.1. Comparison 25 Young person's self-perception (fixed-effect), Outcome 1 Self-perception.
[Analysis 26.1]
Analysis 26.1. Comparison 26 Young person's satisfaction with overall process, Outcome 1 Young offender satisfaction.
[Analysis 27.1]
Analysis 27.1. Comparison 27 Young person's satisfaction without cluster adjustment, Outcome 1 Young offender satisfaction.
[Analysis 28.1]
Analysis 28.1. Comparison 28 Young person's satisfaction without imputed data or cluster adjustment, Outcome 1 Young offender satisfaction.
[Analysis 29.1]
Analysis 29.1. Comparison 29 Young person's satisfaction (imputing positive outcome), Outcome 1 Young offender satisfaction.
[Analysis 30.1]
Analysis 30.1. Comparison 30 Young person's satisfaction (imputing positive outcome) without cluster adjustment, Outcome 1 Young offender satisfaction.
[Analysis 31.1]
Analysis 31.1. Comparison 31 Young person's satisfaction (without decline group), Outcome 1 Young offender satisfaction.
[Analysis 32.1]
Analysis 32.1. Comparison 32 Young person's satisfaction (fixed-effect), Outcome 1 Young offender satisfaction.
[Analysis 33.1]
Analysis 33.1. Comparison 33 Victim/key stakeholder satisfaction with overall process, Outcome 1 Victim/key stakeholder satisfaction with overall process.
[Analysis 34.1]
Analysis 34.1. Comparison 34 Victim/key stakeholder satisfaction without imputed data, Outcome 1 Victim/key stakeholder satisfaction with overall process.
[Analysis 35.1]
Analysis 35.1. Comparison 35 Victim/key stakeholder satisfaction (imputing positive outcome), Outcome 1 Victim/key stakeholder satisfaction with overall process.
[Analysis 36.1]
Analysis 36.1. Comparison 36 Victim/key stakeholder satisfaction (without decline group), Outcome 1 Victim/key stakeholder satisfaction with overall process.
[Analysis 37.1]
Analysis 37.1. Comparison 37 Victim/key stakeholder satisfaction (fixed-effect), Outcome 1 Victim/key stakeholder satisfaction with overall process.