Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Self-management education programmes for osteoarthritis

  1. Féline PB Kroon1,†,
  2. Lennart RA van der Burg1,‡,
  3. Rachelle Buchbinder2,*,
  4. Richard H Osborne3,
  5. Renea V Johnston2,
  6. Veronica Pitt4

Editorial Group: Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group

Published Online: 15 JAN 2014

Assessed as up-to-date: 17 JAN 2013

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008963.pub2


How to Cite

Kroon FPB, van der Burg LRA, Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Johnston RV, Pitt V. Self-management education programmes for osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD008963. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008963.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden, Netherlands

  2. 2

    Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Hospital, Malvern, Victoria, Australia

  3. 3

    Deakin University, Director, Public Health Innovation, Deakin, Burwood, Victoria, Australia

  4. 4

    National Trauma Research Institute, The Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

  1. Joint first author

  2. Joint first author

*Rachelle Buchbinder, Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Hospital, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Suite 41, Cabrini Medical Centre, 183 Wattletree Road, Malvern, Victoria, 3144, Australia. rachelle.buchbinder@monash.edu.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New
  2. Published Online: 15 JAN 2014

SEARCH

[Figure 1]
Figure 1. Flowchart.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2. Summary of the risk of bias across all included studies.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3. Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4. Funnel plot of comparison: 3 SMP versus Usual care/No treatment/Wait list, outcome: 3.1 Self-management of OA.
[Figure 5]
Figure 5. Funnel plot of comparison: 3 SMP versus Usual care/No treatment/Wait list, outcome: 3.3 Dropouts.
[Figure 6]
Figure 6. Funnel plot of comparison: 3 SMP versus Usual care/No treatment/Wait list, outcome: 3.4 Pain.
[Analysis 1.1]
Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 SMP versus attention control, Outcome 1 Self-management of OA.
[Analysis 1.2]
Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 SMP versus attention control, Outcome 2 Pain.
[Analysis 1.3]
Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 SMP versus attention control, Outcome 3 Global OA scores.
[Analysis 1.4]
Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1 SMP versus attention control, Outcome 4 Function—self-reported.
[Analysis 1.5]
Analysis 1.5. Comparison 1 SMP versus attention control, Outcome 5 Quality of life.
[Analysis 1.6]
Analysis 1.6. Comparison 1 SMP versus attention control, Outcome 6 Withdrawals.
[Analysis 1.7]
Analysis 1.7. Comparison 1 SMP versus attention control, Outcome 7 Emotional distress.
[Analysis 2.1]
Analysis 2.1. Comparison 2 SMP versus usual care/no treatment/wait list, Outcome 1 Self-management of OA.
[Analysis 2.2]
Analysis 2.2. Comparison 2 SMP versus usual care/no treatment/wait list, Outcome 2 Engagement in life.
[Analysis 2.3]
Analysis 2.3. Comparison 2 SMP versus usual care/no treatment/wait list, Outcome 3 Pain.
[Analysis 2.4]
Analysis 2.4. Comparison 2 SMP versus usual care/no treatment/wait list, Outcome 4 Global OA scores.
[Analysis 2.5]
Analysis 2.5. Comparison 2 SMP versus usual care/no treatment/wait list, Outcome 5 Function—self-reported.
[Analysis 2.6]
Analysis 2.6. Comparison 2 SMP versus usual care/no treatment/wait list, Outcome 6 Function—performance.
[Analysis 2.7]
Analysis 2.7. Comparison 2 SMP versus usual care/no treatment/wait list, Outcome 7 Quality of life.
[Analysis 2.8]
Analysis 2.8. Comparison 2 SMP versus usual care/no treatment/wait list, Outcome 8 Withdrawals.
[Analysis 2.9]
Analysis 2.9. Comparison 2 SMP versus usual care/no treatment/wait list, Outcome 9 Emotional distress.
[Analysis 2.10]
Analysis 2.10. Comparison 2 SMP versus usual care/no treatment/wait list, Outcome 10 Health-directed activity.
[Analysis 2.11]
Analysis 2.11. Comparison 2 SMP versus usual care/no treatment/wait list, Outcome 11 Skill and technique acquisition.
[Analysis 2.12]
Analysis 2.12. Comparison 2 SMP versus usual care/no treatment/wait list, Outcome 12 Constructive attitudes and approaches.
[Analysis 2.13]
Analysis 2.13. Comparison 2 SMP versus usual care/no treatment/wait list, Outcome 13 Social integration and support.
[Analysis 2.14]
Analysis 2.14. Comparison 2 SMP versus usual care/no treatment/wait list, Outcome 14 Health service navigation.
[Analysis 3.1]
Analysis 3.1. Comparison 3 SMP versus information only, Outcome 1 Self-management of OA.
[Analysis 3.2]
Analysis 3.2. Comparison 3 SMP versus information only, Outcome 2 Engagement in life.
[Analysis 3.3]
Analysis 3.3. Comparison 3 SMP versus information only, Outcome 3 Pain.
[Analysis 3.4]
Analysis 3.4. Comparison 3 SMP versus information only, Outcome 4 Global OA scores.
[Analysis 3.5]
Analysis 3.5. Comparison 3 SMP versus information only, Outcome 5 Function—self-reported.
[Analysis 3.6]
Analysis 3.6. Comparison 3 SMP versus information only, Outcome 6 Function—performance.
[Analysis 3.7]
Analysis 3.7. Comparison 3 SMP versus information only, Outcome 7 Quality of life.
[Analysis 3.8]
Analysis 3.8. Comparison 3 SMP versus information only, Outcome 8 Withdrawals.
[Analysis 3.9]
Analysis 3.9. Comparison 3 SMP versus information only, Outcome 9 Emotional distress.
[Analysis 3.10]
Analysis 3.10. Comparison 3 SMP versus information only, Outcome 10 Health-directed activity.
[Analysis 3.11]
Analysis 3.11. Comparison 3 SMP versus information only, Outcome 11 Social integration and support.
[Analysis 3.12]
Analysis 3.12. Comparison 3 SMP versus information only, Outcome 12 Health service navigation.
[Analysis 3.13]
Analysis 3.13. Comparison 3 SMP versus information only, Outcome 13 Skill and technique acquisition.
[Analysis 3.14]
Analysis 3.14. Comparison 3 SMP versus information only, Outcome 14 Constructive attitudes and approaches.
[Analysis 4.1]
Analysis 4.1. Comparison 4 SMP versus non-SMP intervention, Outcome 1 Self-management of OA.
[Analysis 4.2]
Analysis 4.2. Comparison 4 SMP versus non-SMP intervention, Outcome 2 Pain.
[Analysis 4.3]
Analysis 4.3. Comparison 4 SMP versus non-SMP intervention, Outcome 3 Global OA scores.
[Analysis 4.4]
Analysis 4.4. Comparison 4 SMP versus non-SMP intervention, Outcome 4 Function—self-reported.
[Analysis 4.5]
Analysis 4.5. Comparison 4 SMP versus non-SMP intervention, Outcome 5 Function—performance.
[Analysis 4.6]
Analysis 4.6. Comparison 4 SMP versus non-SMP intervention, Outcome 6 Quality of life.
[Analysis 4.7]
Analysis 4.7. Comparison 4 SMP versus non-SMP intervention, Outcome 7 Withdrawals.
[Analysis 4.8]
Analysis 4.8. Comparison 4 SMP versus non-SMP intervention, Outcome 8 Emotional distress.
[Analysis 4.9]
Analysis 4.9. Comparison 4 SMP versus non-SMP intervention, Outcome 9 Constructive attitudes and approaches.
[Analysis 5.1]
Analysis 5.1. Comparison 5 SMP versus acupuncture, Outcome 1 Global OA scores.
[Analysis 5.2]
Analysis 5.2. Comparison 5 SMP versus acupuncture, Outcome 2 Pain.
[Analysis 5.3]
Analysis 5.3. Comparison 5 SMP versus acupuncture, Outcome 3 Function self-reported.
[Analysis 5.4]
Analysis 5.4. Comparison 5 SMP versus acupuncture, Outcome 4 Function performance.
[Analysis 5.5]
Analysis 5.5. Comparison 5 SMP versus acupuncture, Outcome 5 Withdrawals.
[Analysis 6.1]
Analysis 6.1. Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis, Outcome 1 Self-management in OA.
[Analysis 6.2]
Analysis 6.2. Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis, Outcome 2 Function self-reported.
[Analysis 6.3]
Analysis 6.3. Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis, Outcome 3 Pain.
[Analysis 6.4]
Analysis 6.4. Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis, Outcome 4 Withdrawals.