Intervention Review

Quadriphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception

  1. Huib AAM Van Vliet1,*,
  2. Marjolein Raps2,
  3. Laureen M Lopez3,
  4. Frans M Helmerhorst4

Editorial Group: Cochrane Fertility Regulation Group

Published Online: 9 NOV 2011

Assessed as up-to-date: 24 MAY 2011

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009038.pub2


How to Cite

Van Vliet HAAM, Raps M, Lopez LM, Helmerhorst FM. Quadriphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 11. Art. No.: CD009038. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009038.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Gynaecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine, Leiden, Netherlands

  2. 2

    Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology, Leiden, Netherlands

  3. 3

    FHI 360, Clinical Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

  4. 4

    Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Gynaecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine and Dept. of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden, Netherlands

*Huib AAM Van Vliet, Department of Gynaecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, NL 2300 RC, Netherlands. haam.vliet@worldonline.nl.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 9 NOV 2011

SEARCH

  1. Current Version

    Quadriphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception

    Huib AAM Van Vliet, Marjolein Raps, Laureen M Lopez and Frans M Helmerhorst

    Version of Record online: 9 NOV 2011 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009038.pub2

Previous versions of this article and their online publication dates

  1. Version 1

    Quadriphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception

    Huib AAM Van Vliet, Marjolein Raps, Laureen M Lopez and Frans M Helmerhorst

    Version of Record online: 16 MAR 2011 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009038