Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Media campaigns for the prevention of illicit drug use in young people

  1. Marica Ferri1,*,
  2. Elias Allara2,
  3. Alessandra Bo1,
  4. Antonio Gasparrini3,
  5. Fabrizio Faggiano4

Editorial Group: Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group

Published Online: 5 JUN 2013

Assessed as up-to-date: 21 MAY 2013

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009287.pub2


How to Cite

Ferri M, Allara E, Bo A, Gasparrini A, Faggiano F. Media campaigns for the prevention of illicit drug use in young people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 6. Art. No.: CD009287. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009287.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Interventions, Best Practice and Scientific Partners, Lisbon, Portugal

  2. 2

    University of Torino, School of Public Health, Torino, Italy

  3. 3

    London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK

  4. 4

    Avogadro University, Department of Translational Medicine, Novara, Italy

*Marica Ferri, Interventions, Best Practice and Scientific Partners, European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Cais do Sodre' 1249-289 Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal. marica.ferri@emcdda.europa.eu.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New
  2. Published Online: 5 JUN 2013

SEARCH

[Figure 1]
Figure 1. Study flow diagram. Please note that some studies include more than one article. This explains why there are 23 included studies out of 28 included articles.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2. Randomised controlled trial 'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3. Randomised controlled trial 'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4. Interrupted time series 'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
[Figure 5]
Figure 5. Interrupted time series 'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
[Figure 6]
Figure 6. Prospective cohort studies 'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies
[Figure 7]
Figure 7. Prospective cohort studies 'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
[Figure 8]
Figure 8. Forest plot of comparison: 1 Mass media versus no mass media intervention (RCT), outcome: 1.1 Drug use.
[Figure 9]
Figure 9. Observed and predicted probabilities of past-month methamphetamine use in the Meth Project studies
[Figure 10]
Figure 10. Observed and predicted probabilities of past-year methamphetamine use in the Meth Project studies
[Figure 11]
Figure 11. Forest plot of comparison: 1 Mass media versus no mass media intervention (RCT), outcome: 1.2 Intention to use drugs.
[Analysis 1.1]
Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Mass media versus no mass media intervention (RCT), Outcome 1 Drug use.
[Analysis 1.2]
Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Mass media versus no mass media intervention (RCT), Outcome 2 Intention to use drugs.