Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Cultural competence education for health professionals

  1. Lidia Horvat1,2,*,
  2. Dell Horey3,
  3. Panayiota Romios4,
  4. John Kis-Rigo2

Editorial Group: Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group

Published Online: 5 MAY 2014

Assessed as up-to-date: 10 FEB 2014

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009405.pub2


How to Cite

Horvat L, Horey D, Romios P, Kis-Rigo J. Cultural competence education for health professionals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 5. Art. No.: CD009405. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009405.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Department of Health, Sector Performance, Quality and Rural Health Branch, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

  2. 2

    La Trobe University, Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group, School of Public Health and Human Biosciences, Bundoora, Vic, Australia

  3. 3

    La Trobe University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bundoora, VIC, Australia

  4. 4

    Australian Red Cross, Carlton, VIC, Australia

*Lidia Horvat, Sector Performance, Quality and Rural Health Branch, Department of Health, 50 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. lidia.horvat@health.vic.gov.au.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Edited (no change to conclusions)
  2. Published Online: 5 MAY 2014

SEARCH

[Figure 1]
Figure 1. Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2. Forest plot of comparison: 1 Cultural competence training vs no training, outcome: 1.1 Treatment outcomes.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3. Forest plot of comparison: 1 Cultural competence training vs no training, outcome: 1.2 Treatment outcomes.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4. Forest plot of comparison: 1 Cultural competence training vs no training, outcome: 1.3 Health behaviour.
[Figure 5]
Figure 5. Forest plot of comparison: 1 Cultural competence training vs no training, outcome: 1.4 Involvement in care.
[Figure 6]
Figure 6. Forest plot of comparison: 1 Cultural competence training vs no training, outcome: 1.5 Evaluations of care (dichotomous).
[Figure 7]
Figure 7. Forest plot of comparison: 1 Cultural competence training vs no training, outcome: 1.6 Evaluations of care (continuous).
[Figure 8]
Figure 8. Forest plot of comparison: 1 Cultural competence training vs no training, outcome: 1.7 Knowledge & understanding of health professionals.
[Analysis 1.1]
Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Cultural competence training vs no training, Outcome 1 Treatment outcomes (dichotomous).
[Analysis 1.2]
Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Cultural competence training vs no training, Outcome 2 Treatment outcomes (continuous).
[Analysis 1.3]
Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 Cultural competence training vs no training, Outcome 3 Health behaviour (dichotomous).
[Analysis 1.4]
Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1 Cultural competence training vs no training, Outcome 4 Involvement in care.
[Analysis 1.5]
Analysis 1.5. Comparison 1 Cultural competence training vs no training, Outcome 5 Evaluations of care (dichotomous).
[Analysis 1.6]
Analysis 1.6. Comparison 1 Cultural competence training vs no training, Outcome 6 Evaluations of care (continuous).
[Analysis 1.7]
Analysis 1.7. Comparison 1 Cultural competence training vs no training, Outcome 7 Knowledge & understanding (dichotomous).