Intervention Protocol

Planned early delivery versus expectant management of the term suspected compromised baby for improving outcomes

  1. Diana M Bond2,*,
  2. Adrienne Gordon1,
  3. Jon Hyett3,
  4. Bradley de Vries3,
  5. Angela E Carberry1,
  6. Jonathan Morris4

Editorial Group: Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group

Published Online: 9 NOV 2011

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009433


How to Cite

Bond DM, Gordon A, Hyett J, de Vries B, Carberry AE, Morris J. Planned early delivery versus expectant management of the term suspected compromised baby for improving outcomes (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 11. Art. No.: CD009433. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009433.

Author Information

  1. 1

    RPA Women and Babies, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, RPA Newborn Care, Sydney, NSW, Australia

  2. 2

    Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; The Kolling Institute of Medicine, University of Sydney at the Royal North Shore Hospital, RPA Newborn Care, Sydney, Australia

  3. 3

    Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Department of HIgh Risk Obstetrics, RPA Women and Babies, Sydney, Australia

  4. 4

    University of Sydney at the Royal North Shore Hospital, The Kolling Institute of Medicine, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia

*Diana M Bond, RPA Newborn Care, RPA Women and Babies, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia. diana.bond@sydney.edu.au.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New
  2. Published Online: 9 NOV 2011

SEARCH

 

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows:

To compare the fetal and maternal outcome in expectant management versus planned early delivery for women presenting with a suspected compromised fetus from 37 weeks' gestation or greater.