Intervention Protocol

Slow freeze versus vitrification for embryo cryopreservation

  1. Wei Chua1,*,
  2. Clare Boothroyd2,
  3. Melanie Walls3,
  4. Roger J Hart4

Editorial Group: Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group

Published Online: 18 JAN 2012

Assessed as up-to-date: 27 SEP 2011

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009589


How to Cite

Chua W, Boothroyd C, Walls M, Hart RJ. Slow freeze versus vitrification for embryo cryopreservation (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD009589. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009589.

Author Information

  1. 1

    The University of Western Australia, School of Women's and Infants Health, Perth, Australia

  2. 2

    Greenslopes Specialist Centre, Reproductive, Endocrinology, Gynaecology and Infertility, Greenslopes, Queensland, Australia

  3. 3

    Fertility Specialists of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

  4. 4

    The University of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital and Fertility Specialists of Western Australia, School of Women's and Infants Health, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia

*Wei Chua, School of Women's and Infants Health, The University of Western Australia, 374 Bagot Road, Perth, Australia. WeiYing.Chua@health.wa.gov.au. wei_ying21@hotmail.com.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New
  2. Published Online: 18 JAN 2012

SEARCH

 

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows:

To determine whether live birth rates and clinical pregnancy rates are improved with vitrification compared to conventional slow freeze in women undergoing an ART cycle.