Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Implementation of treatment guidelines for specialist mental health care

  1. Corrado Barbui1,*,
  2. Francesca Girlanda1,
  3. Esra Ay2,
  4. Andrea Cipriani3,
  5. Thomas Becker2,
  6. Markus Koesters2

Editorial Group: Cochrane Schizophrenia Group

Published Online: 17 JAN 2014

Assessed as up-to-date: 10 JUL 2012

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009780.pub2


How to Cite

Barbui C, Girlanda F, Ay E, Cipriani A, Becker T, Koesters M. Implementation of treatment guidelines for specialist mental health care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD009780. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009780.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    University of Verona, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, Verona, Italy

  2. 2

    Ulm University, Department of Psychiatry II, Guenzburg, Germany

  3. 3

    University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Oxford, UK

*Corrado Barbui, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Policlinico "GB Rossi", Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, Verona, 37134, Italy. corrado.barbui@univr.it.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New
  2. Published Online: 17 JAN 2014

SEARCH

[Figure 1]
Figure 1. Study flow diagram.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2. Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3. Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
[Analysis 1.1]
Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Active education + Support for implementation guidelines versus Routine care or Passive dissemination, Outcome 1 Practitioner (process) outcomes: Impact: 1. Polypharmacy at follow-up.
[Analysis 1.2]
Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Active education + Support for implementation guidelines versus Routine care or Passive dissemination, Outcome 2 Practitioner (process) outcomes: Impact: 2. Not screened for cardiovascular risk factors.
[Analysis 1.3]
Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 Active education + Support for implementation guidelines versus Routine care or Passive dissemination, Outcome 3 Patient outcomes: global state: average score (PANSS total, high = poor).
[Analysis 1.4]
Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1 Active education + Support for implementation guidelines versus Routine care or Passive dissemination, Outcome 4 Patient outcomes: satisfaction with care: average score (ZUF8, high = better satisfaction).
[Analysis 1.5]
Analysis 1.5. Comparison 1 Active education + Support for implementation guidelines versus Routine care or Passive dissemination, Outcome 5 Patient outcomes: treatment adherence: not adherent at follow-up.
[Analysis 1.6]
Analysis 1.6. Comparison 1 Active education + Support for implementation guidelines versus Routine care or Passive dissemination, Outcome 6 Patient outcomes: drug attitude: average score (DAI, high = positive attitude).