Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Cognitive behavioural therapies for fibromyalgia

  1. Kathrin Bernardy1,
  2. Petra Klose2,
  3. Angela J Busch3,
  4. Ernest HS Choy4,
  5. Winfried Häuser5,*

Editorial Group: Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group

Published Online: 10 SEP 2013

Assessed as up-to-date: 4 SEP 2013

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009796.pub2


How to Cite

Bernardy K, Klose P, Busch AJ, Choy EHS, Häuser W. Cognitive behavioural therapies for fibromyalgia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD009796. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009796.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr University Bochum, Department of Pain Medicine, Bochum, Germany

  2. 2

    University of Duisburg-Essen, Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Faculty of Medicine, Essen, Germany

  3. 3

    University of Saskatchewan, School of Physical Therapy, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

  4. 4

    Cardiff University School of Medicine, Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Cardiff, UK

  5. 5

    Technische Universität München, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, München, Germany

*Winfried Häuser, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität München, Langerstr. 3, München, D-81675, Germany. whaeuser@klinikum-saarbruecken.de.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New
  2. Published Online: 10 SEP 2013

SEARCH

[Figure 1]
Figure 1. Study flow diagram.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2. Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3. Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4. Forest plot of comparison: 1 Cognitive behavioural therapies versus controls at end of treatment, outcome: 1.1 Pain.
[Figure 5]
Figure 5. Forest plot of comparison: 1 Cognitive behavioural therapies versus controls at end of treatment, outcome: 1.2 Negative mood.
[Figure 6]
Figure 6. Forest plot of comparison: 1 Cognitive behavioural therapies versus controls at end of treatment, outcome: 1.3 Disability.
[Analysis 1.1]
Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Cognitive behavioural therapies versus controls at end of treatment, Outcome 1 Pain.
[Analysis 1.2]
Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Cognitive behavioural therapies versus controls at end of treatment, Outcome 2 Negative mood.
[Analysis 1.3]
Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 Cognitive behavioural therapies versus controls at end of treatment, Outcome 3 Disability.
[Analysis 1.4]
Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1 Cognitive behavioural therapies versus controls at end of treatment, Outcome 4 Self-efficacy pain.
[Analysis 1.5]
Analysis 1.5. Comparison 1 Cognitive behavioural therapies versus controls at end of treatment, Outcome 5 Acceptability.
[Analysis 1.6]
Analysis 1.6. Comparison 1 Cognitive behavioural therapies versus controls at end of treatment, Outcome 6 Fatigue.
[Analysis 1.7]
Analysis 1.7. Comparison 1 Cognitive behavioural therapies versus controls at end of treatment, Outcome 7 Sleep problems.
[Analysis 1.8]
Analysis 1.8. Comparison 1 Cognitive behavioural therapies versus controls at end of treatment, Outcome 8 Health-related quality of life.
[Analysis 2.1]
Analysis 2.1. Comparison 2 Cognitive behavioural therapies versus controls at long-term follow-up, Outcome 1 Pain.
[Analysis 2.2]
Analysis 2.2. Comparison 2 Cognitive behavioural therapies versus controls at long-term follow-up, Outcome 2 Negative mood.
[Analysis 2.3]
Analysis 2.3. Comparison 2 Cognitive behavioural therapies versus controls at long-term follow-up, Outcome 3 Disability.
[Analysis 2.4]
Analysis 2.4. Comparison 2 Cognitive behavioural therapies versus controls at long-term follow-up, Outcome 4 Self-efficacy pain.
[Analysis 2.5]
Analysis 2.5. Comparison 2 Cognitive behavioural therapies versus controls at long-term follow-up, Outcome 5 Fatigue.
[Analysis 2.6]
Analysis 2.6. Comparison 2 Cognitive behavioural therapies versus controls at long-term follow-up, Outcome 6 Sleep problems.
[Analysis 2.7]
Analysis 2.7. Comparison 2 Cognitive behavioural therapies versus controls at long-term follow-up, Outcome 7 Health-related quality of life.