Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates
Editorial Group: Cochrane Neonatal Group
Published Online: 11 JUL 2012
Assessed as up-to-date: 21 MAY 2012
Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
How to Cite
Lingappan K, Arnold J, Shaw TL, Fernandes CJ, Pammi M. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD009975. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009975.
- Publication Status: New
- Published Online: 11 JUL 2012
This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows:
To determine the efficacy and safety of videolaryngoscopy compared to direct laryngoscopy in decreasing the time and attempts required for endotracheal intubation in neonates.
- To determine the effectiveness of videolaryngoscopy in decreasing the adverse effects, including hypoxia, bradycardia and hypotension, due to delay in successful establishment of an airway in neonates.
- To determine the effectiveness of videolaryngoscopy in decreasing airway injury, including palatal, laryngeal or pharyngeal injury, during endotracheal intubation.
Subgroups based on birth weight, experience of personnel, presence of congenital airway malformations and type of videolaryngoscopy equipment will be analyzed if data are available.