This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (3 SEP 2015)

Intervention Protocol

You have free access to this content

Early versus delayed dressing removal for surgical wounds

  1. Rajarajan Ramamoorthy1,
  2. Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy2,*,
  3. Brian R Davidson2

Editorial Group: Cochrane Wounds Group

Published Online: 12 DEC 2012

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010259


How to Cite

Ramamoorthy R, Gurusamy KS, Davidson BR. Early versus delayed dressing removal for surgical wounds (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD010259. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010259.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Royal Free Hospital and University College School of Medicine, University Department of Surgery, London, UK

  2. 2

    Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, Department of Surgery, London, UK

*Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Department of Surgery, Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Hospital,, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK. kurinchi2k@hotmail.com.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New
  2. Published Online: 12 DEC 2012

SEARCH

This is not the most recent version of the article. View current version (03 SEP 2015)

References

Additional references

Ahn 2011
  • Ahn HB, Shin DM, Roh MS, Jeung WJ, Park WC, Rho SH. A comparison of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate adhesives versus conventional suture materials for eyelid wound closure in rabbits. Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2011;25(2):121-7.
Biancari 2010
BNF 2011
  • British Medical Association and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. British National Formulary. 1st Edition. BMJ Publishing Group, 2011.
Boateng 2008
Broex 2009
Chrintz 1989
Cutting 2002
  • Cutting KF, White RJ. Maceration of the skin and wound bed. 1: Its nature and causes. Journal of Wound Care 2002;11(7):275-8.
Deeks 2011
  • Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG (editors), on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group. Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
DeMets 1987
DerSimonian 1986
Dosseh 2008
  • Dosseh Eacute Koue D, Doleaglenou A, Fortey YK, Ayite AE. Randomized trial comparing dressing to no dressing of surgical wounds in a tropical setting [Pansement versus absence de pansement au dela de 48 heures en milieu tropical: essai randomise]. Journal de Chirurgie 2008;145(2):143-6.
Downie 2010
  • Downie F, Egdell S, Bielby A, Searle R. Barrier dressings in surgical site infection prevention strategies. British Journal of Nursing 2010;19(20):S42-6.
Dyson 1988
Egger 1997
Garcia-Gubern 2010
Garner 1986
Gurusamy 2009
Gwosdow 1993
  • Gwosdow AR,  Cunningham JJ,  Lydon M,  Rascati R,  Berglund LG. Evaporative water losses through a temporary wound dressing under simulated wound conditions. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation 1993;14(4):450-4.
Hasan 2009
  • Hasan Z, Gangopadhyay AN, Gupta DK, Srivastava P, Sharma SP. Sutureless skin closure with isoamyl 2-cyanoacrylate in pediatric day-care surgery. Pediatric Surgery International 2009;25(12):1123-5.
Higgins 2002
Higgins 2011a
  • Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
Higgins 2011b
  • Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (editors) on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
Higgins 2011c
  • Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ (editors). Chapter 7: Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
Higgins 2011d
  • Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (editors) on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group and the Cochrane Bias Methods Group. Chapter 16: Special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
Horan 1992
  • Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 1992;13(10):606-8.
Hutchinson 1991
ICH-GCP 1996
  • International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Code of Federal Regulation & ICH Guidelines. Media: Parexel Barnett, 1996.
Keill 1973
Kjaergard 2001
Lawrence 1998
Lefebvre 2011
  • Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J (editors) on behalf of the Cochrane Information Retrieval Methods Group. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
Macaskill 2001
Merei 2004
Mertz 1985
Moher 1998
  • Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?. Lancet 1998;352(9128):609-13.
Newell 1992
RevMan 2011
  • The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.1. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
Schulz 1995
  • Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273(5):408-12.
Schünemann 2011
  • Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Higgins JPT, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Guyatt GH (editors) on behalf of the Cochrane Applicability and Recommendations Methods Group and the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. Chapter 11: Presenting results and ‘Summary of findings’ tables. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
SIGN 2011
  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Search filters. http://www.sign.ac.uk/methodology/filters.html 2011.
Ubbink 2008
  • Ubbink DT, Vermeulen H, Goossens A, Kelner RB, Schreuder SM, Lubbers MJ. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial. Archives of Surgery 2008;143(10):950-5.
Wood 2008
  • Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Jüni P, Altman GD, et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ 2008;336:601-5.