Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Subcutaneous closure versus no subcutaneous closure after non-caesarean surgical procedures

  1. Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy1,*,
  2. Clare D Toon2,
  3. Brian R Davidson1

Editorial Group: Cochrane Wounds Group

Published Online: 21 JAN 2014

Assessed as up-to-date: 29 AUG 2013

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010425.pub2


How to Cite

Gurusamy KS, Toon CD, Davidson BR. Subcutaneous closure versus no subcutaneous closure after non-caesarean surgical procedures. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD010425. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010425.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, Department of Surgery, London, UK

  2. 2

    West Sussex County Council, Public Health, Chichester, West Sussex, UK

*Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Department of Surgery, Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK. kurinchi2k@hotmail.com.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New
  2. Published Online: 21 JAN 2014

SEARCH

  1. You have free access to this content

    Current Version

    Subcutaneous closure versus no subcutaneous closure after non-caesarean surgical procedures

    Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Clare D Toon and Brian R Davidson

    Article first published online: 21 JAN 2014 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010425.pub2

Previous versions of this article and their online publication dates

  1. You have free access to this content

    Version 1

    Subcutaneous closure versus no subcutaneous closure after non-obstetric surgical procedures

    Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy and Brian R Davidson

    Article first published online: 28 MAR 2013 | DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010425