Intervention Review

You have free access to this content

Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience

  1. Myura Nagendran1,
  2. Clare D Toon2,
  3. Brian R Davidson3,
  4. Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy3,*

Editorial Group: Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group

Published Online: 17 JAN 2014

Assessed as up-to-date: 31 MAY 2013

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010479.pub2


How to Cite

Nagendran M, Toon CD, Davidson BR, Gurusamy KS. Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD010479. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010479.pub2.

Author Information

  1. 1

    Department of Surgery, UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK

  2. 2

    West Sussex County Council, Public Health, Chichester, West Sussex, UK

  3. 3

    Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, Department of Surgery, London, UK

*Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Department of Surgery, Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK. kurinchi2k@hotmail.com.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New
  2. Published Online: 17 JAN 2014

SEARCH

[Figure 1]
Figure 1. Study flow diagram.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2. Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3. Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4. Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Box model training alone or supplementing standard surgical training versus standard surgical training, outcome: 1.4 Composite score.
[Analysis 1.1]
Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Box model training alone or supplementing standard surgical training versus standard surgical training, Outcome 1 Time taken for task completion (seconds).
[Analysis 1.2]
Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Box model training alone or supplementing standard surgical training versus standard surgical training, Outcome 2 Error score.
[Analysis 1.3]
Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 Box model training alone or supplementing standard surgical training versus standard surgical training, Outcome 3 Accuracy score.
[Analysis 1.4]
Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1 Box model training alone or supplementing standard surgical training versus standard surgical training, Outcome 4 Composite score.
[Analysis 1.5]
Analysis 1.5. Comparison 1 Box model training alone or supplementing standard surgical training versus standard surgical training, Outcome 5 Time taken for task completion (sensitivity analysis).
[Analysis 1.6]
Analysis 1.6. Comparison 1 Box model training alone or supplementing standard surgical training versus standard surgical training, Outcome 6 Error score (sensitivity analysis).
[Analysis 1.7]
Analysis 1.7. Comparison 1 Box model training alone or supplementing standard surgical training versus standard surgical training, Outcome 7 Composite score (sensitivity analysis).
[Analysis 2.1]
Analysis 2.1. Comparison 2 Different methods of box model training, Outcome 1 Time taken for task completion (seconds).
[Analysis 2.2]
Analysis 2.2. Comparison 2 Different methods of box model training, Outcome 2 Error score.
[Analysis 2.3]
Analysis 2.3. Comparison 2 Different methods of box model training, Outcome 3 Accuracy score.
[Analysis 2.4]
Analysis 2.4. Comparison 2 Different methods of box model training, Outcome 4 Composite score.