Intervention Protocol

You have free access to this content

Laparoscopic-endoscopic rendezvous versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  1. Nereo Vettoretto1,*,
  2. Alberto Arezzo2,
  3. Federico Famiglietti2,
  4. Roberto Cirocchi3,
  5. Lorenzo Moja4,
  6. Mario Morino2

Editorial Group: Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group

Published Online: 30 APR 2013

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010507


How to Cite

Vettoretto N, Arezzo A, Famiglietti F, Cirocchi R, Moja L, Morino M. Laparoscopic-endoscopic rendezvous versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD010507. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010507.

Author Information

  1. 1

    AO Mellini, Laparoscopic Surgical Unit, Chiari (BS), Italy

  2. 2

    University of Turin, Digestive and Colorectal Surgery, Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Turin, Italy

  3. 3

    University of Perugia, Department of General Surgery, Terni, Italy

  4. 4

    University of Milan - IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Milan, Italy

*Nereo Vettoretto, Laparoscopic Surgical Unit, AO Mellini, v.le Mazzini 4, Chiari (BS), 25032, Italy. nereovet@gmail.com.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: New
  2. Published Online: 30 APR 2013

SEARCH

References

Additional references

Alexakis 2012
  • Alexakis N,  Connor S. Meta-analysis of one- vs. two-stage laparoscopic/endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. HPB (Oxford) 2012; Vol. 14, issue 4:254-9. [1477-2574: (Electronic)]
Borzellino 2010
  • Borzellino G,  Rodella L,  Saladino E,  Catalano F,  Politi L,  Minicozzi A,  et al. Treatment for retrieved common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the rendezvous technique. Archives of Surgery 2010; Vol. 145, issue 12:1145-9. [1538-3644: (Electronic)]
Brok 2008
  • Brok J, Thorlund K, Gluud C, Wetterslev J. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61:763-9.
Brok 2009
  • Brok J, Thorlund K, Wetterslev J, Gluud C. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive - Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38(1):287-98.
Cavina 1998
  • Cavina E,  Franceschi M,  Sidoti F,  Goletti O,  Buccianti P,  Chiarugi M. Laparo-endoscopic "rendezvous": a new technique in the choledocholithiasis treatment. Hepatogastroenterology 1998; Vol. 45, issue 23:1430-5. [0172-6390: (Print)]
Collins 2004
  • Collins C,  Maguire D,  Ireland A,  Fitzgerald E,  O'Sullivan GC. A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Annals of Surgery 2004; Vol. 239, issue 1:28-33. [0003-4932: (Print)]
CTU 2011
  • Copenhagen Trial Unit. TSA - Trial Sequential Analysis. http://ctu.dk/tsa/ (accessed 2 April 2013).
EAES 1998
  • Diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Results of a consensus development conference. Scientific Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (E.A.E.S.). Surgical Endoscopy 1998; Vol. 12, issue 6:856-64. [0930-2794: (Print)]
Egger 1997
  • Egger M,  Davey Smith G,  Schneider M,  Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 1997; Vol. 315, issue 7109:629-34. [0959-8138: (Print)]
Gluud 2013
  • Gluud C, Nikolova D, Klingenberg SL, Alexakis N, Als-Nielsen B, Colli A, et al. Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group. About The Cochrane Collaboration (Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs)). 2013, Issue 2. Art. No.: LIVER.
GRADE Pro [Computer program]
  • Brozek J, Oxman A, Schünemann H. GRADEpro (GRADEprofiler) [Version 3.2 for Windows.]. http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/news.htm, 2008.
Gurusamy 2011
  • Gurusamy K,  Sahay SJ,  Burroughs AK,  Davidson BR. Systematic review and meta-analysis of intraoperative versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones. British Journal of Surgery 2011; Vol. 98, issue 7:908-16. [1365-2168: (Electronic)]
Higgins 2011
  • Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org 2011.
Kharbutli 2008
  • Kharbutli B,  Velanovich V. Management of preoperatively suspected choledocholithiasis: a decision analysis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2008; Vol. 12, issue 11:1973-80. [1873-4626: (Electronic)]
Kjaergard 2001
  • Kjaergard LL,  Villumsen J,  Gluud C. Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Annals of Internal Medicine 2001; Vol. 135, issue 11:982-9. [0003-4819: (Print)]
La Greca 2008
  • La Greca G,  Barbagallo F,  Di Blasi M,  Chisari A,  Lombardo R,  Bonaccorso R,  et al. Laparo-endoscopic "Rendezvous" to treat cholecysto-choledocolithiasis: Effective, safe and simplifies the endoscopist's work. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2008; Vol. 14, issue 18:2844-50. [1007-9327: (Print)]
La Greca 2009
  • La Greca G,  Barbagallo F,  Sofia M,  Latteri S,  Russello D. Simultaneous laparoendoscopic rendezvous for the treatment of cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Surgical Endoscopy 2009; Vol. 24, issue 4:769-80. [1432-2218: (Electronic)]
Lella 2006
  • Lella F,  Bagnolo F,  Rebuffat C,  Scalambra M,  Bonassi U,  Colombo E. Use of the laparoscopic-endoscopic approach, the so-called "rendezvous" technique, incholecystocholedocholithiasis: a valid method in cases with patient-related risk factors for post-ERCPpancreatitis. Surgical Endoscopy 2006; Vol. 20, issue 3:419-23. [1432-2218: (Electronic)]
Macaskill 2001
  • Macaskill P,  Walter SD,  Irwig L. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2001; Vol. 20, issue 4:641-54. [0277-6715: (Print)]
Martin 2006
Menezes 2000
  • Menezes N,  Marson LP,  Debeaux AC,  Muir IM,  Auld CD. Prospective analysis of a scoring system to predict choledocholithiasis. British Journal of Surgery 2000; Vol. 87, issue 9:1176-81. [0007-1323: (Print)]
Moher 1998
  • Moher D,  Pham B,  Jones A,  Cook DJ,  Jadad AR,  Moher M,  et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?. Lancet 1998; Vol. 352, issue 9128:609-13. [0140-6736: (Print)]
Morino 2006
  • Morino M,  Baracchi F,  Miglietta C,  Furlan N,  Ragona R,  Garbarini A. Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus laparoendoscopic rendezvous in patients with gallbladder and bile duct stones. Annals of Surgery 2006; Vol. 244, issue 6:889-93; discussion 893-6. [0003-4932: (Print)]
Neoptolemos 1989
  • Neoptolemos JP,  Shaw DE,  Carr-Locke DL. A multivariate analysis of preoperative risk factors in patients with common bile duct stones. Implications for treatment. Annals of Surgery 1989; Vol. 209, issue 2:157-61. [0003-4932: (Print)]
Newell 1992
  • Newell DJ. Intention-to-treat analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research. International Journal of Epidemiology 1992; Vol. 21, issue 5:837-41. [0300-5771: (Print)]
Poulose 2006
  • Poulose BK,  Arbogast PG,  Holzman MD. National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores. Surgical Endoscopy 2006; Vol. 20, issue 2:186-90. [1432-2218: (Electronic)]
Rabago 2006
  • Rábago LR,  Vicente C,  Soler F,  Delgado M,  Moral I,  Guerra I,  et al. Two-stage treatment with preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) compared with single-stage treatment with intraoperative ERCP for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis with possible choledocholithiasis. Endoscopy 2006; Vol. 38, issue 8:779-86. [0013-726X: (Print)]
Royle 2003
  • Royle P, Milne R. Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2003;19(4):591-603.
Saccomani 2005
  • Saccomani G,  Durante V,  Magnolia MR,  Ghezzo L,  Lombezzi R,  Esercizio L,  et al. Combined endoscopic treatment for cholelithiasis associated with choledocholithiasis. Surgical Endoscopy 2005; Vol. 19, issue 7:910-4. [1432-2218: (Electronic)]
Savovic 2012
  • Savovic J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Jüni P, Pildal J, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Health Technology Assessment 2012;16(35):1-82.
Savovic 2012a
  • Savovic J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Jüni P, Pildal J, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2012;157(6):429-38.
Schulz 1995
  • Schulz KF,  Chalmers I,  Hayes RJ,  Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995; Vol. 273, issue 5:408-12. [0098-7484: (Print)]
Thorlund 2009
  • Thorlund K, Devereaux PJ, Wetterslev J, Guyatt G, Ioannidis JP, Thabane L, et al. Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38(1):276-86.
Thorlund 2010
  • Thorlund K, Anema A, Mills E. Interpreting meta-analysis according to the adequacy of sample size. An example using isoniazid chemoprophylaxis for tuberculosis in purified protein derivative negative HIV-infected individuals. Clinical Epidemiology 2010;2:57-66.
Thorlund 2011
  • Thorlund K, Engstrøm J, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Imberger G, Gluud C. User manual forTrial Sequential Analysis (TSA). http://ctu.dk/tsa/files/tsa_manual.pdf 2011 (accessed 2 April 2013).
Topal 2010
  • Topal B,  Vromman K,  Aerts R,  Verslype C,  Van Steenbergen W,  Penninckx F. Hospital cost categories of one-stage versus two-stage management of common bile duct stones. Surgical Endoscopy 2010; Vol. 24, issue 2:413-6. [1432-2218: (Electronic)]
Urbach 2001
  • Urbach DR,  Khajanchee YS,  Jobe BA,  Standage BA,  Hansen PD,  Swanstrom LL. Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surgical Endoscopy 2001; Vol. 15, issue 1:4-13. [0930-2794: (Print)]
Videhult 2009
  • Videhult P,  Sandblom G,  Rasmussen IC. How reliable is intraoperative cholangiography as a method for detecting common bile duct stones? : A prospective population-based study on 1171 patients. Surgical Endoscopy 2009; Vol. 23, issue 2:304-12. [1432-2218: (Electronic)]
Wagner 2004
  • Wagner AJ,  Sobrino MA,  Traverso LW. The long-term follow-up of patients with positive intraoperative cholangiograms during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy 2004; Vol. 18, issue 12:1762-5. [1432-2218: (Electronic)]
Wetterslev 2008
  • Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta -analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61:64-75.
Wetterslev 2009
Williams 2002
  • Williams GL,  Vellacott KD. Selective operative cholangiography and Perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a viable option for choledocholithiasis. Surgical Endoscopy 2002; Vol. 16, issue 3:465-7. [1432-2218: (Electronic)]
Williams 2008
  • Williams EJ,  Green J,  Beckingham I,  Parks R,  Martin D,  Lombard M,  British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 2008; Vol. 57, issue 7:1004-21. [1468-3288: (Electronic)]
Wood 2008
  • Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Jüni P, Altman GD, et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2008;336:601-5.