Get access

Dimercaptosuccinic acid scan or ultrasound in screening for vesicoureteral reflux among children with urinary tract infections

  • Review
  • Diagnostic

Authors


Abstract

Background

There is considerable interest in detecting vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) because its presence, especially when severe, has been linked to an increased risk of urinary tract infections and renal scarring. Voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), also known as micturating cystourethrography, is the gold standard for the diagnosis of VUR, and the grading of its severity. Because VCUG requires bladder catheterisation and exposes children to radiation, there has been a growing interest in other screening strategies that could identify at-risk children without the risks and discomfort associated with VCUG.

Objectives

The objective of this review is to evaluate the accuracy of two alternative imaging tests - the dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan (DMSA) and renal-bladder ultrasound (RBUS) - in diagnosing VUR and high-grade VUR (Grade III-V VUR).

Search methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, and the Cochrane Register of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies from 1985 to 31 March 2016. The reference lists of relevant review articles were searched to identify additional studies not found through the electronic search.

Selection criteria

We considered published cross-sectional or cohort studies that compared the results of the index tests (DMSA scan or RBUS) with the results of radiographic VCUG in children less than 19 years of age with a culture-confirmed urinary tract infection.

Data collection and analysis

Two authors independently applied the selection criteria to all citations and independently abstracted data. We used the bivariate model to calculate summary sensitivity and specificity values.

Main results

A total of 42 studies met our inclusion criteria. Twenty studies reported data on the test performance of RBUS in detecting VUR; the summary sensitivity and specificity estimates were 0.44 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.54) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.86), respectively. A total of 11 studies reported data on the test performance of RBUS in detecting high-grade VUR; the summary sensitivity and specificity estimates were 0.59 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.72) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.87), respectively. A total of 19 studies reported data on the test performance of DMSA in detecting VUR; the summary sensitivity and specificity estimates were 0.75 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.81) and 0.48 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.57), respectively. A total of 10 studies reported data on the accuracy of DMSA in detecting high-grade VUR. The summary sensitivity and specificity estimates were 0.93 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.98) and 0.44 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.56), respectively.

Authors' conclusions

Neither the renal ultrasound nor the DMSA scan is accurate enough to detect VUR (of all grades). Although a child with a negative DMSA test has an < 1% probability of having high-grade VUR, performing a screening DMSA will result in a large number of children falsely labelled as being at risk for high-grade VUR. Accordingly, the usefulness of the DMSA as a screening test for high-grade VUR should be questioned.

Plain language summary

The accuracy of two imaging tests in detecting vesicoureteral reflux

Some children are born with an anatomic abnormality that allows backwards flow of urine from the bladder to the kidney. This is called vesicoureteral reflux or VUR. Children with VUR have more urinary tract infections and develop more renal scars than children without VUR. This is especially the case if VUR is severe. As such, clinicians are interested in finding out which children have VUR. Unfortunately, testing for VUR (using a voiding cystourethrogram or a VCUG or MCUG) involves bladder catheterisation and exposure to radiation. Accordingly, clinicians are interested in finding alternative tests that could replace the VCUG. The authors compared the accuracy of two other imaging tests (ultrasound and DMSA renal scan) to see whether these could replace the VCUG test. Neither test was found to be sufficiently accurate to replace the VCUG test. Although the DMSA scan seems to be good at ruling out high-grade VUR, it falsely labels many children as being at risk for high-grade VUR. Accordingly, DMSA does not appear to be useful as a screening test.

Laički sažetak

Točnost dva slikovna dijagnostička pristupa dokazivanja vezikoureteralnog refluksa

Neka djeca se rađaju s prirođenom anatomskom nepravilnosti koja omogućuje povrat mokraće iz mjehura prema bubregu. To je vezikoureteralni refluks (engl. vesicoureteral reflux, VUR). Mokraćne infekcije i oštećenje bubrega je češće u djece s VUR u usporedbi sa zdravom djecom. Osobito kad se radi o teškom slučaju VUR. Stoga je vrlo važno dijagnosticirati to stanje. Međutim, dijagnostički postupak dokazivanja VUR uključuje postavljanje katetera u mjehur i zračenje (mikcijska cistouretrografija, MCUG). Važno je naći druge metode dijagnostike koje bi mogle zamijeniti MCUG. U ovom Cochrane sustavnom pregledu literature provedena je usporedba točnosti dvije slikovne dijagnostičke metode (ultrazvuk i DMSA snimka bubrega) koji bi zamijenili MCUG. Niti jedna od te dvije slikovne dijagnostičke metode nije bila dovoljno točna kao zamjena za MCUG pretragu. Za DMSA je nađeno da može dobro isključiti visoki stupanj VUR, ali daje lažno pozitivne rezutate za rizik za VUR u mnoge djece. Rezultati ukazuju da DMSA nije koristan kao pretraga probira.

Bilješke prijevoda

Hrvatski Cochrane
Prevela: Vesna Kušec
Ovaj sažetak preveden je u okviru volonterskog projekta prevođenja Cochrane sažetaka. Uključite se u projekt i pomozite nam u prevođenju brojnih preostalih Cochrane sažetaka koji su još uvijek dostupni samo na engleskom jeziku. Kontakt: cochrane_croatia@mefst.hr