Article
Sense of community through Brunswik's lens: A first look
Article first published online: 10 FEB 2006
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<24::AID-JCOP2290140104>3.0.CO;2-P
Copyright © 1986 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company
Issue
1520-6629/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=fa19b06dc68440efea7b7394f417a8ff26b957d8)
Journal of Community Psychology
Special Issue: Psychological Sense of Community, I: Theory and Concepts
Volume 14, Issue 1, pages 24–40, January 1986
Additional Information
How to Cite
Chavis, D. M., Hogge, J. H., McMillan, D. W. and Wandersman, A. (1986), Sense of community through Brunswik's lens: A first look. J. Community Psychol., 14: 24–40. doi: 10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<24::AID-JCOP2290140104>3.0.CO;2-P
Publication History
- Issue published online: 10 FEB 2006
- Article first published online: 10 FEB 2006
Funded by
- National Science Foundation. Grant Number: BNS-78-08827
- DHEW-PHS Biomedical Research. Grant Number: S07-RR-07087
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Although sense of community was heralded by Sarason (1974) as the “overarching value” of community psychology, no theory or definition of the phenomenon has been operationalized or empirically tested. The difficulty in the scientific exploration of sense of community is in the value-laden and phenomenological nature of the experience. Following McMillan and Chavis (this issue), it is theorized that sense of community is represented by four elements: membership, influence, integration and fulfillment of needs, and shared emotional connection. Brunswik's lens model offers an appropriate method for determining the shared domain of the experience within a diverse population. The goal of this study was to develop a Sense of Community Index (SCI) that would allow the determination of the relative influence of various factors on the judgment of sense of community. Twenty-one judges, representing four professional groupings selected from three urban centers, where employed in the rating of 100 sense of community profiles of randomly selected individuals. There was a high degree of consensus among the diverse groups of judges, and a regression equation with 23 predictors derived from the sense of community profile accounted for 96% of the variance of mean judges, ratings of overall sense of community. The results were interpreted as supporting the theory of McMillan and Chavis, which appears suitable both for scientific investigation and as a framework for intervention. The relationships of specific profile items (e.g., neighboring behavior, length of residence, home ownership, involvement in voluntary associations) are related to the four elements and to the prediction of overall sense of community.

1520-6629/asset/JCOP_left.gif?v=1&s=03b192ed9737c3a5c70f8cd8c7ce7580a6ff00d1)