Standard Article

Adaptive Evolution of Centromeric Proteins

  1. Kevin C Roach1,2,
  2. Benjamin D Ross1,2,
  3. Harmit S Malik3

Published Online: 15 NOV 2011

DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0022868

eLS

eLS

How to Cite

Roach, K. C., Ross, B. D. and Malik, H. S. 2011. Adaptive Evolution of Centromeric Proteins. eLS. .

Author Information

  1. 1

    University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

  2. 2

    Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA

  3. 3

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA

Publication History

  1. Published Online: 15 NOV 2011

Abstract

Kinetochore proteins assemble at centromeres and mediate chromosome segregation during eukaryotic cell division. This conserved function conceals a paradox; essential inner kinetochore proteins, CenH3 and CENP-C, evolve rapidly under positive selection in primates, plants and insects. This paradox may be explained by a genetic conflict between selfish DNA sequences at the centromere and the kinetochore proteins that bind them. The centromere drive hypothesis provides a framework for understanding this conflict and makes predictions for patterns of evolution in the composition of the kinetochore. In contrast with the rapidly evolving inner kinetochore, the components of the outer kinetochore do not make contacts with centromeric DNA and evolve more slowly. Furthermore, genetic conflict at the centromere may underlie observed taxonomic differences in the rate of evolution of kinetochore proteins among species with different meiotic programs.

Key Concepts:

  • Despite an essential and conserved function, some centromere-binding proteins evolve rapidly.

  • In contrast to canonical histone H3, the centromeric variant of histone H3 displays striking patterns of positive selection in functionally critical domains.

  • CENP-C displays rapid evolution across a diverse taxa; the functional consequences of this rapid evolution have not yet been studied.

  • Asymmetric female meiosis provides an opportunity for competition among centromeres for evolutionary success but has deleterious consequences in male meiosis leading to genetic conflict.

  • Genetic conflict between centromeres and centromere-binding proteins can explain the divergent patterns of evolution between inner and outer kinetochore proteins, as well as taxonomic differences in rapid evolution of centromeric proteins.

Keywords:

  • centromeres;
  • chromatin;
  • rapid evolution;
  • gene duplication;
  • outer kinetochore;
  • fibrous corona;
  • microtubules;
  • female meiosis;
  • mitosis