Standard Article

Environmental Ethics: An Overview

  1. Robin Attfield

Published Online: 15 AUG 2012

DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0024201

eLS

eLS

How to Cite

Attfield, R. 2012. Environmental Ethics: An Overview. eLS. .

Author Information

  1. Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

Publication History

  1. Published Online: 15 AUG 2012

Abstract

Environmental ethics is the study of normative issues and principles relating to human interactions with the natural environment. It comprises an increasingly significant field of applied ethics, crucial for the guidance of individuals, corporations and governments in shaping the principles affecting their lifestyles, their actions and their policies across the entire range of environmental issues. Debates include theories of normative ethics and of meta-ethics, and the adequacy of individualist, holist and ecofeminist stances. It is characteristically concerned with the good of future generations and of nonhuman species as well as that of contemporary human beings. Its scope includes the interpretation and application of the precautionary principle and of policies of sustainable development, grounds and policies for biodiversity preservation, and the nature and basis of obligations to assist adaptation to global warming, and to mitigate the anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions widely recognised to constitute one of its principal sources.

Key Concepts:

  • Environmental ethics is a field of study, adjacent and comparable to business ethics and bioethics, and not itself a normative stance.

  • Stances in environmental ethics characteristically take into account future generations and nonhuman creatures as well as contemporary human interests.

  • Environmental ethics as a branch of philosophy arose in the 1970s through the work of Richard Routley, John Passmore, Arne Naess and Holmes Rolston.

  • Far from being unavoidable, anthropocentrism avoidably disregards the intrinsic value of nonhuman flourishing and the prevalence of moral concern for nonhuman suffering.

  • Despite their differences of emphasis, animal ethics and environmental ethics need not conflict, and need to be informed by each other.

  • Environmental ethicists can adhere to a range of meta-ethical stances, but objectivism and cognitivism have clear advantages concerning the status of reasons for action.

  • Ecofeminists such as Val Plumwood and Marti Kheel have well argued against excessive rationalism in environmental ethics and for a greater role for the emotions.

  • Rival theories of the causes of ecological problems often undermine each other, but solving these problems may require a restructuring of the global economic system.

  • Policies of sustainable development, as presented in the Brundtland Report of 1987, seek to address these problems through combining development and sustainability.

  • The precautionary principle suggests that a global agreement is urgently needed to mitigate emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane.

Keywords:

  • anthropocentrism;
  • biodiversity;
  • climate change mitigation;
  • ecofeminism;
  • environmental ethics;
  • future generations;
  • intrinsic value;
  • nonhuman creatures;
  • precautionary principle;
  • sustainable development